Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nceqs3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
This isn't copyright law where independent authorship/creation is a defense. The US is a first to file nation, which it shares with nearly every other major country in the world.
92.
▲
Act – The App(le) Association claims to represent small developers
(fosspatents.com)
3 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
93.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
This already exists.
94.
▲
House panel approves expanding anti-money laundering reporting requirements
(washingtonpost.com)
2 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
95.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
German courts don't have the best reputation when it comes to technical subject matter.
96.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
For-profit prisons are a tiny minority of prisons in the US.
97.
▲
Apple, Continental, astroturfers use IoT as pretext for devaluation of patents
(fosspatents.com)
2 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
98.
▲
FTC Launches Investigation into PBMs
(healthcaredive.com)
1 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
99.
▲
Apple's credibility waning: federal judge criticizes Apple for 5G SEP hypocrisy
(fosspatents.com)
3 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
100.
▲
Qualcomm, Nokia, Ericsson take aim at Apple's SEP devaluation agenda
(fosspatents.com)
1 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
101.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
This is categorically false.
102.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
> repulsive & heartbreaking, complete neglect of civil & fair society; yeah, we know. the system continues to try hard to legitimize the legal robber barrony bullshit fucked up horseshit that regards only the very wealthy: we kno
103.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
This case was obliterated on appeal. The Judge's opinion was the laughing stock of the SEP industry for a while. Qualcomm did nothing wrong and this was all part of Apple's massive campaign against Qualcomm to force a positive set
104.
▲
Despicably deceptive: Big Tech's Save Our Standards campaign lies about SEPs
(fosspatents.com)
1 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
105.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
Private Relay is a fantastic feature, definitely one of the better ones Apple has rolled out over the past couple years.
106.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
You ever seen the front page? There is little to no "pro-American" content.
107.
▲
Nicolás Maduro Tries a New PR Campaign: Going Woke
(politico.com)
1 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
108.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
> A patent covers a way of doing things. An essential patent covers the way of doing things. You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. An essential patent is declared essential to a standard (of which there are many). Take
109.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
Legit every major drug company would give you the drug in question for free, not to mention Medicaid, which if you can't afford 7k, you would easily qualify for.
110.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
^This guy gets it. Also, in nearly every parliamentary system the state's ability to quickly invalidate patents by an act of parliament gives them even more leverage in the negotiations with drug companies.
111.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
Not to mention the fact that the entire argument is a strawman. US insurance companies almost always fold in the end.
112.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.4495123
113.
▲
A tale of 2 friends with breast cancer (2018)
(cbc.ca)
2 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
114.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
> I think a country which lets some get rich off of other’s cancer is an abhorrent, indefensible, system. lol
115.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
You ever been to a Canadian hospital?
116.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
Here is a list of the essential patents from the main pool: https://www.mpegla.com/wp-content/uploads/hevc-att1.pdf Find a single US patent that "claims" maths as GP argued. It doesn't exist.
117.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
Every country in the world "endorses" the concept of "essential" patents. It's called a patent.
118.
▲
CIA Launches Tor Site (2019)
(cia.gov)
1 points
by
nceqs3
4y ago
|
0 comments
119.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
Google is just mad they can no longer steal startups/competitors IP. See Sonos v Google at the ITC.
120.
▲
by
nceqs3
4y ago
Well you are in luck because neither of the types of patents you cited can be patented at all.
More ›