Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nbadg
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
32 ms
·
211.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
Agreed. From the post, it seems to me like another (IMO better) alternative to this awkward attr-specific convention and syntax etc would be to create a factory function for dynamic class definition, in a similar vein to namedtuples. This i
212.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
On the other hand, going in the other direction (from machine to brain) is actually surprisingly easy. It turns out that, when you take what is possibly the best general-purpose signal and pattern interpretation and recognition engine in th
213.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
From an outside perspective with no skin in the game (other than using Python profusely and just generally wanting it to be the "best" possible Python it can be) I wouldn't be so quick to call it obviously unfair. The exact p
214.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
For what it's worth, the article's title caption reads > However, Uber’s CEO is said to oppose an acquisition at any price due to antitrust concerns. So pretty clearly, Kalanick agrees.
215.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
I honestly don't remember; it was more than 18 months ago. I may have even eventually gotten it working through pinctrl, but I vaguely remember having to do something with device trees and rebooting or something. No, I take that back,
216.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
> By using mmap and toggling the register directly from a C++ program, the GPIO can be toggled at about 2.8 MHz, much faster than the device driver approach. I mean, it doesn't need to be C++. I was getting pretty close to that spee
217.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
Since we're getting pedantic, as HN is wont to do, I'm not sure if the parent complaint is about the first sentence... > VOLTAGE is to electricity what pressure is to water: the more you have of it the more oomph you get. ... o
218.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
> like many commentors mentioned before, we're going to be going through a very rough period for some time where IoT devices just aren't up to par with expected security procedures... Hopefully either a consumer or business all
219.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
> ...and it's simple to disconnect and reconnect yourself with 2 or 3 wires. This "sort of" works for now, depending on where you live, what season, whether or not you keep junked tech, etc. But it strikes me, not only as
220.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
Here's the thing. Chaotic systems with no negative feedback always diverge. If you put a microphone in a room full of speakers, with no one to turn down the volume and nothing to switch off the microphone, the white noise will always b
221.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
Hello! The tl;dr is: IoT is a totally new arena for privacy and security, and existing best practices either don't work well for eg. playing with a Raspberry Pi, or require trusting companies like Facebook with access to your baby moni
222.
▲
Show HN: Hypergolix: effortless, end-to-end encrypted IoT development
(github.com)
7 points
by
nbadg
10y ago
|
1 comments
223.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
I think it's important to point out that not only did Twilio choose a great problem to address, it was (critically) also one that a large audience already understands is very difficult. There are plenty of equivalently "valuable&q
224.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
It certainly could, as it has full knowledge of what's connected. That's quite a ways down the road though; for now we're focusing on Razpi <-> computer. Mobile deployment is much more complicated (also a much larger ma
225.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
If they were using the protocol, they have two options: 1. Roll their own implementation (highly discouraged). Increase their development burden. Introduce higher maintenance burden. Slightly more flexibility for app deployment. And run the
226.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
In my case you actually do know that the vendor is using the protocol. You would have to be running the protocol on (in this example) your iPhone in order to talk to it. Everything is client-side verified and enforced by encryption. You wou
227.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
Definitely. First a disclaimer: I've held off on creating a dedicated post for this until the code is stable (as in not crashing) enough for other people to play with the demo. That will hopefully happen tomorrow, or possibly Friday. A
228.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
Would you feel comfortable with end-to-end encryption via an open, documented, free protocol? This is literally my raison d'être as a company, so I'd be interested to hear your comfort level. What I've got is a platform that
229.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
> The reason for this fundamental conclusion is as follows. All instances of smart contract theft or loss – in fact, the very definition of smart contract theft or loss, is fundamentally about differences between implementation and inten
230.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
I think you're mistaking value to redditors with value to reddit. Clearly the benefit to the average redditor is minimal at best. But considering imgur is creating its own communities at this point, and linkjacking direct images to poi
231.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
Keep in mind that 5XX error codes are for server errors and 4XX codes are for client errors. Returning 429 would imply "too many connections (from your computer)", not total for the service. Choosing to return a 503 for over-taxed
232.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
No problem, it's especially hard to find external feedback for side projects and experiments so I try to give it when I can. > I assumed it works correctly because it fixed my "too many open files" exception It works, so a
233.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
Yeah, my biggest complaint personally is that combining multithreading and async is a massive pain in the ass. Now, realistically, you aren't usually going to want to do that, except if you have multiple event loops, or are bridging be
234.
▲
by
nbadg
10y ago
First off, awesome to see more benchmarks (even if it's just personal experimentation) for synchronous vs asyncio performance. I think the real argument for asyncio right now is that it makes it very easy for you to write extremely e
235.
▲
by
nbadg
11y ago
Hi Sam. Two questions: 1. I'm a little in the dark about what happens to applications that have already been seen (because they were submitted early) that are then edited pre-deadline. I've been putting off submission because I&#x
236.
▲
by
nbadg
11y ago
Particularly if someone is specifically targeting 1password, which they (almost by definition) already would be. It'd just be a single patch to the exploit and you're back in business. Well, okay, obviously that's an oversimp
237.
▲
by
nbadg
11y ago
You're correct, the loopback works as you described. You should never see loopback packets anywhere but the host machine; if you do, that machine is compromised (not necessarily maliciously, but it's not working how it's supp
238.
▲
by
nbadg
11y ago
Unlikely to be correct re: nomination, though it's difficult to know how the election will effect the confirmation process, and vice versa. Kagan was nominated May 2010 and confirmed August 2010; Sotomayor was nominated May 2009 and co
239.
▲
by
nbadg
11y ago
This has been confirmed by the governor of Texas. https://twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/698629632816500738
240.
▲
Lean is less about money and more about mindset
(medium.com)
1 points
by
nbadg
11y ago
|
0 comments
More ›