nawgz

21 ms·

271.
by nawgz 4y ago
That’s exactly what I’m saying. There IS no other usage of “gat”, just look online, it exclusively is referring to guns. What kind of counter argument is an incorrect analogy misstating something already spoken? Wish you had ended it a comm
272.
by nawgz 4y ago
Perhaps it's not fully mainstreamed, but looking at the current conversation it looks to me like the idea is widespread. Really though, I also see no other other usages of the term online, it surprises me you would not simply type in &
273.
by nawgz 4y ago
The dictionary definition of "gat" is "revolver", does that really qualify as "obscure"? Anyways, in terms of usage I've heard, it is almost exclusively implying you'll brandish and/or apply your
274.
by nawgz 4y ago
If I read the command `gat myfile` I would definitely assume you were trying to delete it with prejudice. I would be surprised to see it print to my terminal. Edit: why downvotes? You can’t use words as commands that invoke a completely dif
275.
by nawgz 4y ago
Because it's trivial to accomplish these things in other languages without containers?
276.
by nawgz 4y ago
> I disagree You disagree that "you shouldn't need a clean OS every time you want to use a new language version"!? ... I don't even know what to say, that's not something you can disagree with > If you try to
277.
by nawgz 4y ago
Pragmatic advice, certainly, but maybe it's missing the point - you shouldn't need a clean OS every time you want to use a new language version. That's a ridiculously large failure of packaging.
278.
by nawgz 4y ago
Do you really think it's appropriate to read my comment as a general argument and not a reprimand of its parent?
279.
by nawgz 4y ago
Do you honestly find this quote out-of-sorts with what a normal CEO says? Oil companies have been knowingly poisoning the globe for their own profit - no probabilities involved - since at least the 70s, probably earlier, and on the flip-sid
280.
by nawgz 4y ago
I don't think writing a function called `float` that apparently accepts arrays as an argument is very elegant at all
281.
by nawgz 4y ago
"Why didn't you simply have a test for an unexpected failure case which arose as a result of moving pieces across a distributed system?" - whateveracct
282.
by nawgz 4y ago
Jokes about fascism aside, you can tell that our social climate is in a very unhealthy and unstable spot when something that was previously a community staple has been relegated to the outskirts and can be attacked with not only impunity fr
283.
by nawgz 4y ago
On the examples given, it definitely looks the best of all of them, and seems to be as small as or smaller than their size I'm not really sure I understand why all the others are presented in base83 though, while this uses binary/
284.
by nawgz 4y ago
> Also, I can literally build a million lines repo faster than the frontend which is relatively small and just outputs goddamn js and css files.. My UI type-checks, transpiles, and stores itself as an NGINX container or a static bundle o
285.
by nawgz 4y ago
> > The end result is identical > Citation needed. What do you mean? You cited it yourself: > Installing npm dependencies in different orders Fortunately, there is no difference in order between running it as a command and addin
286.
by nawgz 4y ago
How is it "on me" that stupid "opinions" are being expressed? First of all, the context was: my initial comment's GP: "I do really like how easy the packaging is in Python and JS is", "Maven and Gradl
287.
by nawgz 4y ago
> Modifying text files that are human readable are a big no-no. Silly absolutes are a big no-no. You don't use automatic code formatting!? Using commands to modify a literal list is fine.
288.
by nawgz 4y ago
The root of this thread is the person I responded to claiming NPM, as an easy-to-use package manager, would "become a double-edged sword that swings back at you" Meanwhile, you are having to tell me Java package management is actu
289.
by nawgz 4y ago
These downvotes are absurd. The parent comment asserts, without evidence, that "NPM being easy to use is a double-edged sword that will swing back at you". I have never seen any evidence of this in action. What would it even mean!
290.
by nawgz 4y ago
> It is absolutely trivial to use different proxies in different environment based on env vars, local files, etc. For something to be "absolutely trivial", you would expect the average user to be able to produce trivial-looking
291.
by nawgz 4y ago
Say more. My package.json is part of source code. I can manually write it myself and run `npm install` afterwards; or I can do both steps via a command. The end result is identical: my package.json has a new package, and my local machine ha
292.
by nawgz 4y ago
This is a dinosaur opinion, wow. Would you also avoid generating client types for type-safe API consumption because you have to run a command to do that instead of writing the client yourself? After all, the client is source code for the cl
293.
by nawgz 4y ago
For my Java projects, to support different environments - corp proxies, let's say - I have to have entire different gradle files, plugins, options, routing, it's just disgusting. For my JS projects (obviously actually TS these day
294.
by nawgz 4y ago
Lol, what? NPM is amazing
295.
by nawgz 4y ago
Are you sure you know enough about web development to make these claims? All of my data viz code is React-controlled SVGs, for instance. I was able to implement generic zoom and pan on top of this. Also things like nested graphs look good i
296.
by nawgz 4y ago
I like that, multiplicative value because you can self-apply the lessons you applied to your product. Thanks for sharing the knowledge then.
297.
by nawgz 4y ago
I'm always curious what makes you credentialed for this type of business / corporate knowledge. It's not to denigrate this person or their current company, but Causal itself seems to only be at the Series A point in funding,
298.
by nawgz 4y ago
I don't mean to downplay; clearly and surely this should be investigated. But actually, I typo'd quite badly: the ratio is 1 in 700000, not 1 in 15000 (how did I make that mistake?) Anyways, I hope it's clear that a 1 in 7000
299.
by nawgz 4y ago
Edit: I do apologize, I typo'd. My ratio should have been 1 in 700k, not 1 in 15k > of dying or become incapacitated Sorry, I don't see any death in the logs, can you point me to recent aviation deaths that were caused by this?
300.
by nawgz 4y ago
Looks like Shiki: https://github.com/shikijs/shiki If you "inspect" the elements with the mouseovers, you can see they statically compiled the TS definition into the HTML. I guess it probably uses the same AP

More ›