Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
navinp1912
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
navinp1912
11y ago
Agree whole heartedly. I was asking this thinking of open(<file>,O_DIRECT|O_RDONLY); that bypasses buffer cache and read directly from the disk that atleast solves buffer cache i guess. The disk cache is another thing ie if we disabl
2.
▲
by
navinp1912
11y ago
How does checksumming help if the data is in cache and waiting to be written ? For ex: I have 1MB of data, i write it but it stays in buffer cache after written and when you do checksum you are computing the checksum on buffer cache . On L
3.
▲
by
navinp1912
11y ago
Can someone give similar hackerrank/job challenge + resume links for other orgs ?
4.
▲
by
navinp1912
11y ago
I'm using HP ZBook 15 G2 Mobile Workstations with ubuntu 14 LTS since last 3 months. The only thing i miss is SSD that i didn't choose in my customization. Has 16GB RAM, i7 . I switch between Win 8.1 and linux (something lxde inst
5.
▲
by
navinp1912
12y ago
>>>I won't go into the details that led up to this event<<<< Fix the problem and then go ahead and do whatever you want. Atleast you would be helping one other person. One you have crossed the line, there are no r
6.
▲
by
navinp1912
13y ago
If you move what while (topK--) into the map loop , it becomes an online code for topK whereas what you wrote is an offline . If you want offline then pushing it into a priority_queue and then popping it out would be much faster.
7.
▲
by
navinp1912
13y ago
string s,f; map<string,int> M; set<pair<int,string> > S; while(cin >> s) { M[s]++; int x=M[s]; if(x>1) S.erase(make_pair(x-1,s)); S.insert