Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
natmaka
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> It's the best business model ever In France the Cour of Audit concluded that electricity produced by the EPR must be sold at 138€/MWh (2023 value) in order to obtain a tiny ROI (4%). This is a financial disaster. Proof page 2
62.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> When you consider long term, it gets even worse for intermittent renewables. Nuclear, on the other hand is a license to print money Non-backed-up nonsense. > With all due respects to your "analysis", the French auditors ca
63.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
See also the "Catalog of fantastic things" (J. Carelman). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Carelman
64.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
... and it many cases comes at a very low cost as quite often an index enabling to satisfy the usual "quickly find something" standard need exists, and most of them let us immediately obtain a sorted list.
65.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> solved problem due to fast breeder reactor For this we need an industrial model of breeder reactor. Please name it. There is none. Many nations (US, France, Germany, Japan...) engulfed huge amounts of money on this quest, during decad
66.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
>> The money Germany "wasted" on renewables brought down prices a lot, > It massively increased the price of electricity in Germany. We all have to consider the total cost on the long term. I analyzed it for France. I w
67.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> Not shutting down the existing nuclear plants is a pure positive Ask Japan, and especially Fukushima's residents, about this. > building out renewables and/or nuclear plants in the east. Germany chose renewables and cannot
68.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
I'm not an expert not pretend to be one. IMHO your "They are extremely tough targets, and fairly easy to defend" is quite different from what I quoted.
69.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> doubling every decade Uranium deposits mined under the right conditions can supply the current stock for at best two centuries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining#Peak_uranium To extend this beyond that,
70.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Maybe. Maybe not. Nobody knows for sure, however after each of these click/bang the "there will be no more problem!" thesis seems less and less prominently published.
71.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
I wrote "During the past 25 years" Please describe any nuclear reactor which was successfully built in France or Germany during the past 25 years. France: https://sites.google.com/view/electricitedefrance/
72.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
A problem with nuclear waste is that living being (especially human beings) must not be exposed to it.
73.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
It depends upon nuclear accident victims' estimation one choses to consider. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl:_Consequences_of_the... Moreover pretending that the words nuclear accident is not more dangerou
74.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
It is not about blackouts but about the risk induced by a nuclear plant in a warzone. That's what International Atomic Energy Agency's (UN agency in charge of civilian nuclear) boss said about it: "Director General Grossi rei
75.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Deploying a continental renewable mix (wind, solar...) reduces the effets of 'intermittency' on electricity production. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S09601... https:&#
76.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
A nuclear plant may be hit by despair, even if it isn't the target, and in any case finding who hit it may be difficult. Right now in Ukraine...
77.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Germany could have decarbonized faster by maintaining its nuclear power, but only to a limited extent because the bulk of the coal (especially lignite, a high CO2 emitter) is burned to generate electricity in the former East German regions,
78.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> it's not just nuclear, it's also Natural gas No, it can be a continental renewable mix + storage, with a "backup" made of green hydrogen turbines.
79.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Agrivoltaics (dual use of land for solar energy and agriculture) is gaining ground in many nations. This is heavy industry, the pace is slower than in most sectors (IT...). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaics
80.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
After decades of R&D and numerous lab and prototypes reactors able to do so (mainly fast breeders)... there is not a single industrial model ready to be deployed.
81.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
The point is not about "someone may not err" but about "someone may err", or more precisely "someone WILL err", coupled with the effects of such mistakes. Failing to correctly design, build, exploit or maintain
82.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> Nuclear can be turned up and down relatively easily TLDR: it doesn't work this way. Detailed version: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41796580
83.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
In many Western nations bury them is now forbidden. Most are burnt in cement kilns (producing useful heat). In France, 95% of the mass of a wind turbine must be recycled (legal obligation), the concrete base is not spared and the law requi
84.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> From a technical point of view, nuclear waste is a solved problem When it comes to nuclear waste repositories real experts official publish: "Internationally, it is understood that there is no reliable scientific basis for predict
85.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
During the past 25 years there were projects aiming at building industrial nuclear reactors. They all ended badly (canceled, way over budget or delay...).
86.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> South Korean company build a NPP in 7 years in Saudi Arabia. Barakah (delivered March 2024) was late (by about 3 years?), undersold (KEPCO hadn't any other ongoing project and the Korean government at the time wanted a nuclear pha
87.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
> Flamanville 3 failed because of screwups in the design and construction Indeed, and it is so undeniable that it is the official conclusion. Source (French): https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/media/organes
88.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
At least 5 times, indeed: it was due to cost 3.3 billion euros, its cost to date is 23.7, it it not running at full power and a major update (reactor cover) is already planned. https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article&#x
89.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
Most Russian Roulette games have many 'clicks' before the 'bang'.
90.
▲
by
natmaka
1y ago
I doubt so: 416 industrial nuclear reactors are deployed in the world today. They produce 10% of the electricity, itself 20% of the final energy, so nuclear power produces at best 2% of the energy consumed. Nuclear power would provide 10%
More ›