Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
nater5000
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
nater5000
5d ago
>Classification models have been around for a while. I'm still trying to catch-up on the Jev stuff, but my understanding is that it's basically just a more efficient LLM when all you want is the LLM to produce a classificatio
2.
▲
by
nater5000
8d ago
Why is this showing up on my feed? lol
3.
▲
by
nater5000
8d ago
This article is just an ad for the phone. It doesn't offer anything other than just repeating the same trite takes about Apple in general. They do, however, sum up the value proposition nicely: >So the iPhone Duo’s appeal isn’t root
4.
▲
by
nater5000
8d ago
https://artificialanalysis.ai/#intelligence-comparison-tabs Astra on xhigh has a cost per task of $2.31 with an intelligence index of 53. Qwen3.8 Max has a cost per task of $5.41 with an intelligence index of 45. Pricing fo
5.
▲
by
nater5000
8d ago
But it's not lol If Gemini can complete a task for $1 and Qwen completes that same task for $1, then the cost per token is irrelevant in most use-cases. One would think this stuff should correlate well enough that you can use it as a p
6.
▲
by
nater5000
8d ago
I actually just pulled out my old Duet and took a quick look to see if I could just put proper Linux on it. Didn't seem feasible for the amount of effort I was willing to put into it, so I bailed. Reading this, though, I now see I wa
7.
▲
by
nater5000
10d ago
>Anthropomorphizing the AI is a convenient excuse to take responsibility away from companies that are building and wielding it. That's completely at odds with itself. If people are generally convinced that AI is conscious, then comp
8.
▲
by
nater5000
10d ago
>There is no need to give rights to something that's can't suffer or be killed. The argument is that these machines can end up becoming sentient/conscious/etc. in a meaningful way (i.e., like a human). I can assure yo
9.
▲
by
nater5000
11d ago
I don't know, this seems like an idea that maybe works in a specific context being generalized past the point of the original idea making sense. If the user needs to download a specific application to run this these web apps, then wh
10.
▲
by
nater5000
11d ago
People are consuming useless plastic toys at an unfathomable rate. It's one example, but it likely contributes so much more to the stress on our planet than actual robots capable of providing actual utility by a huge margin. I'll
11.
▲
by
nater5000
11d ago
Crazy how large of a vacuum MinIO left lol
12.
▲
by
nater5000
12d ago
>I fail to see how trying to attract more women alienated men It's less about Nike making decisions that men don't like and more about Nike spreading themselves too thin. Just think about Nike as a company: the products they ac
13.
▲
by
nater5000
14d ago
Wouldn't it be better to just link to the actual blog post? https://blog.ryan.ceo/astra-makes-a-mug
14.
▲
by
nater5000
14d ago
>How will GPT-5.6 Sol and GPT-6 Sol be differentiated? You literally just differentiated them in this sentence?
15.
▲
by
nater5000
15d ago
>then the Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris Not that it really matters to your point, but this happened in 2015. Seems kind of odd to include that in this list.
16.
▲
by
nater5000
16d ago
You know, if enough tech workers at Microsoft felt strongly about these ethical issues, they could influence Microsoft's decisions internally which is probably the most effective position to be in to do so. But all well, glad you can f
17.
▲
by
nater5000
16d ago
I mean, they literally tell everyone they're "spying" on their customers. They've made that very clear.
18.
▲
by
nater5000
16d ago
Nah, this is working backwards. I've seen this dynamic plenty of times before: someone gets comfortable with some workflow in a limited context, and try to force into larger, more sophisticated context where it doesn't work as wel
19.
▲
by
nater5000
16d ago
>as the consumer This is where this discrepancy occurs. AWS (etc.) aren't targeting "consumers," they're targeting enterprises. Enterprises want to use these services with minimal interference and overhead. They'
20.
▲
by
nater5000
16d ago
>it really amazes me how fearless Deepseek are Reel it in a bit, man.
21.
▲
by
nater5000
16d ago
The title kind of buries important details about the distribution of these costs and their changes. For example, Apple TV+ went from $4.99 per month to $14.99 per month, a +200% change, while YouTube Premium went from $11.99 to $15.99, a +3
22.
▲
by
nater5000
16d ago
>Good! Smaller files! You know computers have the ability to compress videos, right? >Do I really need 4k HDR to enjoy Seinfeld? No, but the difference between 480p and even 1080p is pretty significant and definitely makes the viewing
23.
▲
by
nater5000
16d ago
I hear what he's saying, and I'm not saying he's wrong (in essence), but I think Tao (like a lot of other people) are going to have to get with the program a bit. AI is going to radically change a lot of things. It's g
24.
▲
by
nater5000
17d ago
Well, yeah? I didn't think anybody seriously thought otherwise?
25.
▲
by
nater5000
17d ago
>I believe that "have to" is a little strong, no? Yeah, you don't HAVE TO do anything your employer tells you to do. And they don't HAVE TO keep you employed. That's the deal. >by remaining one of the only peo
26.
▲
by
nater5000
17d ago
I mean, even outside the context, you ought to be fired for not doing what your employer is telling you to do. Being fired for insubordination is not really "political"; it's the epitome of a performance reason. You're l
27.
▲
by
nater5000
17d ago
I definitely think there's a lot to be done with small models dedicated to specific tasks. I've always thought the REAL value is in having large models be able to easily build small models for custom tasks (which I know is kind of
28.
▲
by
nater5000
18d ago
I have "stuff" I like. I even have a wife whom I love. But you're missing the whole point if you think that's what this post is discussing. I want "stuff" that I can't buy, like being able to work with oth
29.
▲
by
nater5000
18d ago
Lol right? And the REAL irony is that this will likely just be a way to show you even MORE ads while collecting MORE data for MORE targeted advertising. If Muse could actually just show me content that I want to see and cut out all of the o
30.
▲
by
nater5000
18d ago
I mean, Google and x.AI already have stuff like this. There's plenty of other options as well. And even outside of that, I've heard the promise of "let AI book your reservations!" since before LLMs became a thing. None o
More ›