natch

36 ms·

151.
by natch 1y ago
Thank you, Grok.
152.
by natch 1y ago
Believe me there is plenty of thought on this side of the fence. Less so on the other it would seem...
153.
by natch 1y ago
That's not backup funding; that's turning over control to a shadowy figure who had a different agenda.
154.
by natch 1y ago
Thanks! That makes sense, but didn't come to mind right away for some reason.
155.
by natch 1y ago
Rotation relative to what?
156.
by natch 2y ago
Good question, but also, study some history. This did not start in 1948, nor in that century even.
157.
by natch 2y ago
iCloud ADP is secure* *We are not allowed to tell you this part. In fact, this line and the star were edited out prior to publication. You’re welcome.
158.
by natch 2y ago
Or how Siri obnoxiousness and denseness ruined HomeKit. Or how Watch has the full power of all my location info, my driving status, my motion, all opted in, but can't figure out squat. My watch thinks last week I did a 23 mile hike in
159.
by natch 2y ago
Replace Siri. Don't make it better. The Siri persona is flawed. It has a dated and corporate sense of humor, is a prude about the most innocuous and natural uses of language, and is not game for anything. It was impressive for the firs
160.
by natch 2y ago
"iCloud is secure… we don't have the keys."* *except for backup. oops.
161.
by natch 2y ago
OpenAI is already solving the problem for all its competitors by hobbling its models so much. With voice mode OpenAI hears its own voice as interruptions, then misrecognizes what it itself is saying to be some topic that is off limits. It t
162.
by natch 2y ago
Many sources, Chinese government could be one.
163.
by natch 2y ago
People are leaving bad reviews for the book online. We need to leave bad reviews for the publisher. It’s a publisher problem.
164.
by natch 2y ago
Yawn. No details, and stated range is not EPA, so it's meaningless.
165.
by natch 2y ago
Not formally an ML researcher but I’ve heard this (and similar from Melanie Mitchell) and it seems like ridiculous gatekeeping. There’s no real rule worthy of any respect imho that LLMs can’t be configured to get additional input data from
166.
by natch 2y ago
I mean… he has supported at least one good cause I know of where the little guy was getting screwed way beyond big time and he stepped up pro bono. So I like him. But probably mostly a hired gun.
167.
by natch 2y ago
Heavy hitter lawyer, PR expert. Some google terms: Masters of disaster, Spin cycle.
168.
by natch 2y ago
>the reputation of the winning team and the reputations of all the teams who did cryptanalytic work >NIST is essentially just proctoring Well, there we go. These items are actually good information (to be verified of course). Way bett
169.
by natch 2y ago
>He's also required by law to do it, but he specifically said he would. Do you know him as a man of his word? I don't. I think he'll do whatever makes sense for his goals in the circumstances. And those goals are often ali
170.
by natch 2y ago
I would just encourage you to keep your eyes open and listen to the other side, and revisit this post and see how it ages.
171.
by natch 2y ago
Your question presupposes a claim that the selection process is compromised. I'm not saying it is. I just wonder how we know it's not. In NIST's position one could analyze the submissions for vulnerabilities to closely held (
172.
by natch 2y ago
You are tptacek; I believe you know exactly what I meant. But to indulge you, do you think we can know that the selection process is not comprised?
173.
by natch 2y ago
Exactly.
174.
by natch 2y ago
If you think the bad actors are only on one side, you are in a bubble that is feeding you bad information.
175.
by natch 2y ago
And chosen by NIST…
176.
by natch 2y ago
Claiming loyalty is a litmus test for layoffs is a bit incendiary and a needless introduction of a strongly biased view of politics into the conversation. No doubt for leadership levels an active disinterest in helping enable open inquiry i
177.
by natch 2y ago
Absolutely getting to the bottom 20% when I'm doing it right ("right" == faster trip). That makes the charges faster at each stop. Also I find it more fun to stop every hour for 5-10 minutes than every 2 hours for 30-40 minut
178.
by natch 2y ago
270, wow. You could just ignore the estimate number, or go back to gas. My “tests” haha are more like 2,500 - 3,500 miles with almost ten of these under my belt and I’m a happy camper, and I don’t have to go slow but then I chose the brand
179.
by natch 2y ago
Driving style and speed also factor into it. My car doesn't get anything near the advertised mileage but that's because of speed and driving style. I'm thrilled with it. On long road trips I fill (charge) to about 1.5X my exp
180.
by natch 2y ago
So, move the goal posts. If you are doing it, and you are, turnabout is fair play. And with lives at stake (I can give examples) you’ll understand that he might get some shit done and yeah that is not perfectly comfortable for everybody, bu

More ›