Thanks for clarifying. I chose what seemed the most likely interpretation of an ambiguity. If it works for you, think of it as a drawing out of the argument,

Thanks for clarifying. I chose what seemed the most likely interpretation of an ambiguity. If it works for you, think of it as a drawing out of the argument, instead of a counterpoint to you. I’m arguing against the others who think there has been some grievous wrong committed by training models on this data.