namuol

29 ms·

451.
by namuol 8y ago
Just FYI, you can easily include a @babel/standalone script to get JSX in your script tags. https://reactjs.org/docs/add-react-to-a-website.html#quickly...
452.
by namuol 8y ago
> Model wise this is just openAI's GPT with some very slight modification (laid out in the paper). > The secrecy and controversy makes no sense if the model is open, even the methodology of data collection is laid out. This is ex
453.
by namuol 8y ago
Have you been following NLP closely lately? It seems like most of the frustration and/or skepticism is coming from those closest to the field (i.e. researchers), so I'm pretty sure I'm missing a big part of the picture. I&#x2
454.
by namuol 8y ago
> not extraordinary compared to state of the art, open NLP research > misrepresents progress in the field Can you point me to some examples of unsupervised learning with similar results? Not asking for rhetorical purposes; I just genu
455.
by namuol 8y ago
First, it's clearly the goal of OpenAI to bring more public attention to advances in the field, specifically to help voters and policymakers consider potential ramifications well in advance of any "truly" groundbreaking wor
456.
by namuol 8y ago
> the never-ending cycle of Hot Frameworks React has been out for 5 years and it's popularity is only growing. It sticks. Alternatives aren't anywhere close, and the ones that do are just variations on the same pattern. We&#x27
457.
by namuol 8y ago
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ahttps...
458.
by namuol 8y ago
I think we're confusing coupling with co-locating. Hooks actually make it easier to separate things like side effects and state management from a component when compared to the status quo of class based components with lifecycle method
459.
by namuol 8y ago
> He does not fit in the company culture that we want to build. Sounds like you already know what to do.
460.
by namuol 8y ago
How to stop it: Use a different hosting service.
461.
by namuol 8y ago
Amazing! I would love to see something like this integrated into browser devtools. There should be massive perf benefits if you could work directly with the JS VM, for instance.
462.
by namuol 8y ago
This suggests that the "wealth gap" (Endowment gap) of colleges in the US is increasing, probably at an accelerating rate. This is probably not a good thing. I wonder how much of a difference the tax-exempt status is a factor in
463.
by namuol 8y ago
I use comments to document assumptions that are likely to be wrong, either now as I write it, or later when someone (probably myself) changes it. It is absolutely useful to do, and really not too difficult. Languages that allow for more for
464.
by namuol 8y ago
I'm suggesting we should be wary of inflammatory/controversial, trending content. Usually the attention content receives is proportional to how polarizing it is, not how nuanced or important it is. This is a legitimate problem, an
465.
by namuol 8y ago
Relevant: "This Video Will Make You Angry" (CGP Grey) https://youtu.be/rE3j_RHkqJc
466.
by namuol 8y ago
Babel transforms/codemods/linters. Working on a growing team means needing to find ways to automatically enforce patterns and practices that genetic linters aren't really capable of on their own. It's like a superpower.
467.
by namuol 8y ago
These aren't apples-to-apples with subsidies on coal because there are significant long term health and climate costs associated with coal.
468.
by namuol 8y ago
Why must everything be absolute? You can have urban farming and rural farming. Urban farming would obviously have to happen gradually, so start with easier stuff. It's not "impossible". The point is that it will reduce pres
469.
by namuol 8y ago
Every problem you describe sounds like a solvable engineering problem. We may need to design our buildings to accommodate these kinds of problems, but that doesn't mean they should be dismissed outright -- The potential energy benefits
470.
by namuol 8y ago
Who said anything about eliminating all large-scale rural farms? (And FWIW what I imagine would still very much be commercial farming) Even barring any future innovation in city planning (better distribution of sunlight, etc), architectur
471.
by namuol 8y ago
I'm not talking about every family having their own little "plot" on their own little roof. I'm talking about large greenhouses covering large buildings.
472.
by namuol 8y ago
Do you believe we should continue mining and burning coal? It's bad, but if we close all the coal mines and factories, a lot of people will lose their way of life. Large-scale farming (which vastly dominates the rural land mass of the
473.
by namuol 8y ago
Climate change poses no risk to people over 70.
474.
by namuol 8y ago
> You can't test your way to safety. > "Testing only catches that if you target your testing program for it." Seems like a contradiction to me. That said, just because testing alone isn't good enough doesn't m
475.
by namuol 8y ago
How do you feel about coal mining? Is that a way of life?
476.
by namuol 8y ago
Indeed they would; I wasn't clear in my comment, but basically the less we rely on rural farming, the less dogmatic fear of government regulation. (But mainly there's a ton of efficiency gains we could reap if we saw more large-sc
477.
by namuol 8y ago
Unless you are personally working to stop the inevitable Heat Death of the Universe, there are always bigger problems to solve.
478.
by namuol 8y ago
It's just an engineering/scaling problem. Large-scale urban farming via large rooftop greenhouses could dramatically lower the total cost of growing some foods, especially if you consider the future environmental cost of land-use
479.
by namuol 8y ago
Most Earthlings live in cities. Cities are way more efficient than spread-out rural towns and villages[1], but we still mostly rely on rural land for food, so they continue to exist. Because rural needs and daily experiences are very differ
480.
by namuol 8y ago
What's your point? Are smoking/tobacco regulation and E Coli testing somehow mutually exclusive?

More ›