namarie

14 ms·

121.
by namarie 9y ago
Why should we look at it that way?
122.
by namarie 9y ago
>To live a life free of consequences? To live a fulfilling life without the constant fear of not being able to adequately provide for yourself or your offspring? >And who pays? Since it'd be us, collectively, as a society who wou
123.
by namarie 9y ago
It is if you think not every moment in the last millenium was pleasant for everyone.
124.
by namarie 9y ago
A flat tax rate would put a significant, unfair burden on poorer people.
125.
by namarie 9y ago
> (from not staring into blue lights late into the night) f.lux solves this problem.
126.
by namarie 9y ago
And sympathy clearly makes up for the poorest 20% of the country, right?
127.
by namarie 9y ago
I disagree completely. I love the characters of Fëanor, of Beren and Lúthien, of Elu Thingol, of Tuor, of Elwing... Also, the plots of the stories hold a lot of the attention (at least for me).
128.
by namarie 9y ago
Actually, draws are almost impossible in Go. I also doubt that pros will try to memorize openings like chess players would; they're very different games and this sort of opening memorization is way more important and efficient in chess
129.
by namarie 9y ago
Aren't we actually better at endurance running than any other animal?
130.
by namarie 9y ago
Because it lost points by playing sub-optimally.
131.
by namarie 9y ago
That's Hajin Lee I think, who was also commenting.
132.
by namarie 9y ago
It had a 10-15 point advantage in the middle game. It chose to whittle it away in the endgame in exchange for more safety. In my opinion that makes it even more impressive.
133.
by namarie 9y ago
Since when is it counter-intuitive that exercise is good? I'd have thought the opposite.
134.
by namarie 10y ago
If that were true no coup d'état would ever happen in any democratic country.