Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
naasking
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
54 ms
·
931.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
Does it seem plausible to that a system that is intentionally, systematically, algorithmically optimized to keep your attention and drive engagement really has so little affect on us?
932.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> Cancel culture used to be called social exclusion/ostracism, and it has been how people police themselves against undesirable people in pre-internet communities where most everybody knew everybody. Even if this were true, its appl
933.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> This works because people can choose to not be jerks, but they can't choose to not be black. What if they could? People can change gender identity nowadays, and it's not outside the realm of possibility that people could chan
934.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
More than that, your body downregulates unconscious activity (known as NEAT). This reduces fidgeting and even influences how likely you are to get up, say if you're thirsty or have to pee. In a caloric deficit, you're more likely
935.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> But putting ViewModels in Resources also doesn’t work very well. ViewModels are not abstract concepts like “a post”; each ViewModel describes a specific piece of UI. As a result, the shape of your “Post” Resource grows to encompass the
936.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> And when I had to add alpine.js to do client-side reactivity, it immediately was obvious that I'd love to have both sides (backend and frontent) unified. https://alpine-ajax.js.org/
937.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> .NET Core requires you to jump one version up almost every year, which has a much higher maintenance cost. This is basically seamless now, the framework isn't changing in backwards-incompatible ways anymore.
938.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> - Industry inertia — teams hesitate to rewrite working systems without a compelling business reason. Isn't this how it should be?
939.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
I have no knowledge of DNG, what I was suggesting is that someone should devise a some kind of extensible, self-describing format that can be used in place of RAW without losing any sensor data as with JPEG/HEIC/etc.
940.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> It is supposed to be raw data from the sensor with some additional metrics streamed in, just sufficiently standardized to be used in the camera-vendors' toolchain for development. This is what I was thinking, that there are potent
941.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> The weird thing about it though is that whatever the dark matter is it has to be spread out. In fact, they'd have to be so spread out that rotation curves remain flat past a million light years [1]. There seems to be no plausible
942.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
Income, assets and capital gains are clearly defined in the tax code.
943.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
There's a fairly clear line between opinion and advertisement. For instance, one is paid for and the other is given freely.
944.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> you are self-imposing a restriction that will give other nations an economic advantage and jeopardizing long-term sovereignty. I don't see how you reached this conclusion, unless you think advertising/propaganda yields bet po
945.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> specifically denies any noticable associations with fluoride at the levels recommended in countries that add fluoride to water . (Emphasis added) Which is not a claim that was being discussed in this subthread, since the original clai
946.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
"Unbiased" would be a complete and detailed recitation of all of the facts surrounding an incident, arguably down to particles. Anything less introduces some kind of bias. For instance, describing an event as an interaction of p
947.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> Or, maybe, "leaning left" by the standards of Zuck et al. is more in alignment with the global population So you think that most content on the internet that forms the training corpus reflects the opinions of "the global
948.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
They won't move past tokenization, but you can take it down to the byte level and make it arbitrarily flexible and adaptive: https://ai.meta.com/research/publications/byte-latent-transf...
949.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
"World ending" is not the only valid security metric. Lots of viruses, worms and security vulnerabilities have. This is increasingly untenable as more of people's lives are in data.
950.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
That seems a little melodramatic, particularly since your only other options are that every untrusted program can access every authority like capturing every keystroke, or all programs are effectively neutered.
951.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> Yeah, though 'jcelerier brought up a case where "insecure" behavior is a feature, and the more "secure" design is directly incompatible with it I don't think it's fundamentally incompatible with a s
952.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> the original refutation was "fluoride in the drinking water concentrations is proven safe and it doesn't affect brains". No, this is the original claim: > but it turns out that there are a decent amount of good studie
953.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
Fluoride does have neurotoxic effects though.
954.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43525098
955.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
> I agree that attitudes towards security are generally very poor, but breaking working infrastructure sounds like a crazy practice. Yes, breaking infrastructure is bad. But letting already broken infrastructure continue can be worse. Th
956.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
Does the study not literally refute the claim that fluoride's negative impact on IQ is lacking in evidence, contrary to the original claim? What exactly do you think needs to be updated?
957.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
The source of fluoride is irrelevant, the effect of fluoride is cumulative. If you're getting half of the "harmful dosage" just from your water, you're much more likely to pass that threshold than if the water had no flu
958.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
Maybe apply some critical thinking and notice that the water levels from fluoridation add on top of any other sources of fluoride people ingest, eg. toothpaste, food, etc.
959.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
The source of fluoride is irrelevant, the effect of fluoride is cumulative. If you get 0.7mg/L from drinking water and then add toothpaste and other sources, you could easily surmount the level where harmful effects occur.
960.
▲
by
naasking
2y ago
This also has issues with security fixes, unfortunately.
More ›