Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mythz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
92 ms
·
961.
▲
#Script – Live Scripting of .NET
(sharpscript.net)
3 points
by
mythz
8y ago
|
0 comments
962.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Hooks are a popular approach for implementing notification callbacks for long running requests over HTTP. Bidirectional streaming is irrelevant here, the question is what's so limiting about using HTTP for this use-case? (i.e. by far t
963.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Why? What's so limiting about calling remote services over HTTP?
964.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Turned out to be a very popular opinion [1] that OSS having commoditized the cost to develop Software to near zero that the primary benefactors are the major cloud hosting providers who are able to extract rent from hosting OSS software. Wh
965.
▲
#Script – Live Scripting of .NET
(sharpscript.net)
5 points
by
mythz
8y ago
|
0 comments
966.
▲
#Script – Live Scripting of .NET
(sharpscript.net)
3 points
by
mythz
8y ago
|
0 comments
967.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
My first foray into US shares was in a managed funds which saw me lose 25% of my net worth and they still took their 1.5% fee for their service. I decided I'd rather lose money due to my own decisions and loaded up on AAPL instead whic
968.
▲
.Net Core Chromium Desktop Apps
(docs.servicestack.net)
5 points
by
mythz
8y ago
|
0 comments
969.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
This is just a PR piece to justify to their customers why they're staying closed source. The obvious reason is that they'd make a lot less revenue if it were OSS/free. They're right that there's several business mod
970.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
They're only central R&D because MS employ most of the paid dev resources working on it and no one would use any forks except from MS (or possibly Google, but they wouldn't ratify MS's platforms by investing resources in
971.
▲
Sharp Script – Live Scripting of .NET
(sharpscript.net)
10 points
by
mythz
8y ago
|
0 comments
972.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
That TL;DR is super condensed...
973.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Just want to add a +1 this is incredible how much you've managed to do in such a short amount of time - a seriously impressive feat of engineering to even attempt, yet you've managed to come out with a working demo already.
974.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
I'm assuming it's to try de-anonymize users and make bots less cost effective. Nothing propagates faster than hate on Twitter and seeing as it's being actively weaponized to spread propaganda, I'm all for new measures th
975.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
> doesn't it make sense to build a defensible strategy , building things your competitors will find hard to copy ? How does looking at what your competitors are doing help with building a defensible strategy? Either you're copy
976.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Agree with PG. I mean I'd love to have the free time to be able sit analyze and strategize against what my competitors are doing, but I'm too busy working on the next place which I believe will add the most value. In the end you&#
977.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
IMO the fear is being overstated, everything's written down in either in single deploy script or configured CI, i.e. there's not going to be some loss of know how. It's the same as if the person in charge of Heroku leaves, so
978.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
What pain is Heroku saving you to justify being 5x more expensive than Lightsail/Digital Ocean/Linode? All websites I maintain/deploy are either built as a Docker image and published by CI on git check-in or deployed locally
979.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Never heard of Paradise Bay but it's sad to see years of creative effort disappearing from the face of the earth like that. A game of this quality could've definitely have been sold off and kept running on a skeleton crew which wo
980.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
I felt the same regret after each major upgrade where it seemed as breaking versions were due to unnecessary superficial API changes (which also left behind a trail of outdated docs/examples). Ended up sticking through it as it appeare
981.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
I usually shudder when I see React Router major versions which usually result in hard breaks that takes hours to migrate existing code bases to, so I'm pleasantly surprised to see: > v5 is fully backwards compatible with 4.x It appe
982.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
It doesn't, parent is suggesting everyone benefits when cloud providers use their accumulated wealth to hire people to work on their OSS investments as some kind of justification for the consolidation of wealth from OSS happening aroun
983.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Defaults matter. Users don't change defaults unless they have a good reason to, and statistically they don't.
984.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
> we’ve always agreed on one thing一that healthy, thriving markets are in everyone’s interest. We're so much in agreement that we're only going to trial that healthy, thriving market in the EU - where we're legally obligate
985.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
It would just need to prohibit usage by the 3 major cloud monopolies, using any language that just applies to all 3 of them, e.g. a commercial license is required if earning over $1 Billion total from hosting Services. It could also prohibi
986.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Cloud providers were only possible because they can host OSS without licensing restriction or costs, they've worked out that they could charge for computing by providing hosting and is where they've put their billion dollar Cap-Ex
987.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
There's no line after, there will only ever be the 3 multi-billion dollar cloud monopolies at the end of the food chain, the toll booth collecting rent for hosting others OSS efforts.
988.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
The topic and answers are on why it's unfortunate that Cloud Monopolies are reaping most of the wealth from OSS and why they're happy to keep the status quo which grows their monopolies bigger each passing year. Never that there w
989.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Right, so everyone should be happy working for the "exposure" so they can be snapped up by Cloud Companies using the wealth created from hosting their OSS efforts who will then be put to work on strengthening their cloud monopolie
990.
▲
by
mythz
8y ago
Collusion is secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy in order to cheat or deceive others. As with any standardization efforts this is just cooperation, there's nothing secretive, illegal or deceitful about it - they'd just be
More ›