mythz

61 ms·

871.
by mythz 7y ago
As I've said above, only OSS projects that create custom builds from source use the AGPL/FLOSS license, the license was added to allow OSS projects to use all of ServiceStack without needing to pay for a developers license. All ot
872.
by mythz 7y ago
Yeah I'm surprised there's so much focus on the license of a free library that's also OSS. The AGPL/OSS license only applies if you're creating a custom build from source in OSS projects, if you're just using #
873.
by mythz 7y ago
Thx for the tip, made the feature more prominent in the home page: https://sharpscript.net
874.
by mythz 7y ago
Yeah it's an embeddably dynamic scripting language that can be used within .NET Core / .NET Framework Apps: https://sharpscript.net/docs/introduction To use any library you just need to provide a script metho
875.
by mythz 7y ago
The issue with leftpad was that it was a transitive dependency that was yanked and broke everyone depending on it. Gists don't have any dependencies, their encapsulated within the Gist where all code is easily inspectable and publicly
876.
by mythz 7y ago
So Sharp Apps don't have any external dependencies, your App on load can fetch any additional external resources if it needs to, but that's independent to Sharp Apps. They're effectively run assuming everything is on Disk, th
877.
by mythz 7y ago
Not sure what you mean by version dependency, Gist Apps don't have any dependencies, each Gist App is self-contained within its own Gist. You can run a previous version of a "Released" App when it's published to a GitHub
878.
by mythz 7y ago
It's multi-purpose: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20742459
879.
by mythz 7y ago
Replied in sibling comment, you can run your local version and never update, you can also run a specific released version that is immutable: https://sharpscript.net/docs/gist-desktop-apps#plugins
880.
by mythz 7y ago
left pad is a transitive dependency issue, running an "Always up-to-date" version is no different to visiting a Website that can be shutdown at anytime, except once you've run a Gist App once, you can run it locally offline i
881.
by mythz 7y ago
Did you have a look at the features on https://sharpscript.net ? The only time it compares with PowerShell is when it's used to execute Sharp Scripts [1] which is only 1 of its use-cases. You can embed it inside .NET/C
882.
by mythz 7y ago
What's the difference to running any installed software? Except when running from a public Gist you can inspect all the Source code before running it, know which verified User Account the software is released under and have a public au
883.
by mythz 7y ago
Then forget this OSS license option even exists, which you're never going to use unless you build a custom distribution of ServiceStack without a commercial license. The AGPL/FLOSS license exists to allow free usage in OSS project
884.
by mythz 7y ago
ServiceStack's usage in OSS projects is covered in its License: https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack/blob/master/lic... i.e. It can be used as AGPL as-is, in addition it can be used in OSS p
885.
by mythz 7y ago
That’s how it will always be. You can’t retract an OSS license, and the old ServiceStack v3 you're referring to continues to be available 6 years later: https://github.com/ServiceStackV3/ServiceStackV3
886.
by mythz 7y ago
.sh is for shell scripts which is the only time where #Script stand-alone .ss scripts are used, overloading .sh would confuse what’s a Bash Script or a #Script Script, which are completely different.
887.
by mythz 7y ago
One of its coolest features (just added in the latest release) is Gist Desktop Apps: https://sharpscript.net/docs/gist-desktop-apps Where Sharp Apps can also be published to Gists where they can be run on-the-fly witho
888.
by mythz 7y ago
‘.ss’ is the most obvious ext for “SharpScript”, but that only applies for stand-alone scripts where you can also use .html extension since most of time it’s used as a template language inside HTML pages that’s embedded inside a .NET/
889.
by mythz 7y ago
#Script is not a product that's for sale. It's gratis for all use-cases.
890.
by mythz 7y ago
The Exceptions are for OSS projects, where it can be used as the OSS license for that project. Regardless it's completely free to use for both commercial/non-commercial usage.
891.
by mythz 7y ago
It's completely free to use as mentioned at the bottom of the home page: https://sharpscript.net/#free The source code for ServiceStack.Common is inside the https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceS
892.
SharpScript(sharpscript.net)
156 points by mythz 7y ago|51 comments
893.
#Script(sharpscript.net)
3 points by mythz 7y ago|0 comments
894.
by mythz 7y ago
> When exactly does this pushing up of the stock price occur? When the buyback is announced? When it is actually executed? Sometime in between? It depends on the size of the BuyBack and whether they're getting them at a discount, bu
895.
by mythz 7y ago
Investors don't get to value shares, they get to sell them and Buy Backs increases the demand for shares which pushes the stock price up in the short-term at least. A lot of the valuation of public companies are speculative based on th
896.
by mythz 7y ago
This completely ignores demand which pushes the stock price up in the short-term, and with less shares outstanding, each share has a larger % of the company. i.e. if you buy 50% of a companies outstanding shares, there's no way you&#x2
897.
by mythz 7y ago
> For Google, the less productive they are, the better. So Google spends a tonne of resources developing Tensor Flow only to OSS it, commoditizing AI and making it more accessible than ever, gives away lots of $$$ on AI competitions enco
898.
by mythz 7y ago
That's a pretty warped view, 8chan is the support system for radicals which in all likelyhood gives them the motivation to commit mass murder since they have an audience to play to and support for their demented views. As the article s
899.
by mythz 7y ago
> Okay. Let’s make it a little less political... What are the chances that a Democratic President will get anything done? This has instead segued into predicting the hypothetical effectiveness of a unknown future Democratic President...
900.
by mythz 7y ago
> Another presidential candidate said he would “clear the swamp”. How did that work out? She's never been a presidential candidate, but what do the words of a pathological liar have to do with anything? That no-one can be trusted an

More ›