mythbuster2001

3 ms·

1.
by mythbuster2001 8y ago
Driverless trains are not a problem to begin with. If you have a train and it carries hundreds of people [or trainload of cargo], it is economically irrelevant whether it has a human operator or not. So it is safer to have a human there jus
2.
by mythbuster2001 8y ago
I'm not sure anything that came out from OpenAI so far, justifies that sort of compensation... Maybe they have some aces up their sleeves...
3.
by mythbuster2001 9y ago
These numbers are actually much worse than one would think based on the PR.
4.
by mythbuster2001 9y ago
Wait till your Macbook dies and you try to pull some data out of the soldered on SSD. I find dongles annoying, lack of magsafe irritating but the soldered on SSD is what really puts me off.
5.
by mythbuster2001 9y ago
This is a great example on how one can get fooled by optimizing the wrong measure. This should be introductory material to machine learning, before any algorithm gets introduced.
6.
by mythbuster2001 9y ago
This is not rain. This is a drizzle on a very well maintained, center divided freeway, where the radar and ultrasonic sensor has a very nice reference (divider). Also with cars tracked in front. Example of (non-autonomous) driving in a real
7.
by mythbuster2001 9y ago
You are dogmatically defending Turing test which I think is the primary source of this confusion. Turing test says: if it fools humans into thinking its intelligent it is intelligent. That is fair. But once some other humans understand the
8.
An Engineer Is Painting Surreal Scenarios That Confuse Self-Driving Cars(creators.vice.com)
5 points by mythbuster2001 9y ago|0 comments