mykmelez

4 ms·

1.
by mykmelez 8y ago
> Again, it seems that for LMDB is again "solving" the problem by ignoring it. Which is OK if it fits your use case... But shouldn't Firefox work properly on 32-bit systems? Or did they completely decide that they don&#x27
2.
by mykmelez 8y ago
According to @hyc in https://monero.stackexchange.com/questions/2606/are-the-lmdb... , "As of v0.10.0, yes the LMDB files are cross-compatible between 32 and 64bit architectures. They have always been cross-co
3.
by mykmelez 9y ago
It does require X to be installed, although it doesn't actually use X, and the X implementation can just be Xvfb. Unfortunately, fixing that is hard. I think Chrome has the same limitation. For Firefox, the issue is tracked in https
4.
by mykmelez 9y ago
Hi, I'm the Product Manager for Headless Firefox at Mozilla. No, this wasn't a reaction to Chrome. We decided to implement headless mode last fall after research last summer indicated that it would increase website testing in Fir
5.
by mykmelez 9y ago
(Note: I'm the product manager for the headless browsing feature of Firefox.) I chose to prioritize WebDriver support because it's a popular way to drive headed Firefox, and I wanted to make it as easy as possible for existing Web
6.
by mykmelez 9y ago
Great article! I'm the product manager for the headless feature, and I'm unsure why `binary.add_command_line_options('-headless')` doesn't work for you, as the flag does work when invoking Firefox directly: > &qu
7.
by mykmelez 11y ago
Hmm, I thought it was obvious that this recommendation applies only during benchmarking by PluotSorbet developers, not when the project is being used to run a midlet. But perhaps not, so to clarify: if you're hacking on PluotSorbet, an