mycure

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mycure 10y ago

   I'm reading what I can find :) Sorry if I missed information, it was not my intention to say that IPFS was not good, just to say that the purpose was different from Infinit's. Redundancy: https://github.com/ipfs&#x
2. 2.▲
   by mycure 10y ago

   Infinit's goal is not to compete against IPFS which is focusing on providing a protocol for distributing content. IPFS does not focus on providing redundancy, fault tolerance, rebalancing or file-level functionalities such as access co
3. 3.▲
   by mycure 12y ago

   Feel free to ask more precise questions about the architecture but basically it goes like that. Upon registration, a cryptographic key pair (RSA) is generated on the user's computer so Infinit does not have access to the user's pr
4. 4.▲
   by mycure 13y ago

   Sorry, I replied above. Here is my response: "The files are encrypted with RSA using the recipient's public key. In other words, Infinit never has access to the transferred data. We compare the file transfer feature (not synchroni
5. 5.▲
   by mycure 13y ago

   The files are encrypted with RSA using the recipient's public key. In other words, Infinit never has access to the transferred data. We compare the file transfer feature (not synchronization) which is, with Dropbox, the right click -&g