Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mw888
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
The most notable, destabilizing proclivity that Universities have been engaging in for recent decades (keep in mind many have been around for centuries ) is participating at all, and lo, converging towards in specific political action whic
62.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
The two are fundamentally different. PoS is less secure on a deeper level, you can accumulate stake with no barriers - cheap energy (and that’s just the first step) not so much.
63.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Your comment serves no purpose, offers no feedback, and is rude.
64.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Not mentioned: workers.
65.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
An easily gameable strategy is promising benefits to new citizens, whether or not it makes sense to give those benefits or take on new citizens. You encourage the influx, and make the vote choice obvious. Is this happening? I don’t really k
66.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
This certainly won’t help collateralize those liabilities. Tangentially, and for the record, as someone passionate about crypto currency, this type of sunshine into much of what DeFi and tokenized businesses are is a relief. What’s popular
67.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
It was difficult to glean the perspective of the author, but the piece seemed to rely (at first) on understanding where the author comes from. Just a bit of feedback of structure. I do agree with the general sentiment - crypto communities a
68.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Because spreading negativity is easy, and clearing it up is hard. Clearing it up is hard, but worth it, but Twitter’s structure makes that hard type of work even harder by having character limits and measuring value by popularity.
69.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Yeah, if larger jurisdictions behaved as such the issues I described are easier to avoid. I don’t think the regulatory bodies have an attitude towards crypto that would enable that large scale attempt at control, but we can see how it’s pos
70.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Now quell our concerns with the same rhetoricals but in the top 0.1% range, like for, say, Amazon.
71.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Democratized AI will not explode, it will thrive as centralized services until the day real time AI is expected by consumers.
72.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
It’s a good conversation starter this one is, at least.
73.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
That’s an interesting take on things. Would you say this condition generalizes to other animals, or unique to ones above a certain level of intelligence?
74.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
The Righteous Mind by Jonathon Haidt opens with the moral, psychological explanation of this phenomenon: the brain judges first, and explains later. Often times the reasons do not make much sense. It is some sub-rational decision making pro
75.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
> Courts forcing forks I wouldn’t be so sure about that, unless you are equally convicted in that court’s jurisdiction’s conviction to outright ban the whole chain from use - because as soon as two courts mandate two different forks, one
76.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Small communities that do not tolerate thought control.
77.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
So the best indicator of harm from vaccines allowed its well to be poisoned from the start? Certainly smells bad.
78.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
This reply come off clearly as divisive, but it says a lot how easy this is to interpersonal from le either side .
79.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
It seems like the bubble that’s been bursting for the last couple of years obvious to anyone paying attention is that microdosing is not equal to the sum of its doses. The studies which show inspiring results on hard problems like PTSD and
80.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
I think this is most important: a safe parking lot. Indoor parking which requires identification to enter.
81.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
This is a strange place to end up; you make a convincing argument against the somewhat unsophisticated and very common capstone of digital privacy. But if you really want to be private online, there are always ways, if not existent, possibl
82.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
I’m for reinvention, and if thinking radically is what it takes to make the more typical and known processes evolve, so be it. I do have skepticism about a model liberated from the text file - most tools fall back heavily on our use of lang
83.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
If I could give myself advice as a younger programmer it would be to focus more on C or even lower level paradigms. Once you learn some Python and Javascript it’s no big issue to jump around, get rusty, or move to something else higher leve
84.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
I can’t say for sure but I vaguely recall reading complaints that some ARM CPUs are similarly flawed.
85.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
That’s an oxymoron.
86.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
When I was getting started programming what I really wanted was to learn C or Haskell. When it came down to actually making some basic programs, it was always easiest just to use Python for it. It’s a good language on top of being ‘easy,’ a
87.
▲
Ask HN: Do you worry about CPU backdoors like IME?
17 points
by
mw888
4y ago
|
16 comments
88.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
And what of the backdoor present in all consumer CPUs which intelligence agencies are exclusively allowed to purchase disabled? If you are making that argument, it seems like we’re already in quite dim a spot.
89.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Maybe you’re just stuck in The Matrix. Not implying you should be alt right, but maybe stop thinking about everything in relationship to what you perceive as “alt-right,” which is a spurious term to begin with.
90.
▲
by
mw888
4y ago
Didn’t read the article? They say at the end if this is how Eth manages a known consensus system, it reflects poorly on how they will implement a far more complicated and unexplored one.
More ›