It was difficult to glean the perspective of the author, but the piece seemed to rely (at first) on understanding where the author comes from. Just a bit of fee

It was difficult to glean the perspective of the author, but the piece seemed to rely (at first) on understanding where the author comes from. Just a bit of feedback of structure. I do agree with the general sentiment - crypto communities actively facing away from deep problems, are problematic, and the built in financialization (which is necessary to generate cost of attack in real blockchains - though hundreds of real blockchains are certainly not required) makes discerning FUD from criticism harder than it would be otherwise.