mvrckhckr

6 ms·

1.
by mvrckhckr 5mo ago
The price of something is not necessarily the function of the cost of producing it. It is the value to the buyer. Of course, you have edge cases on both sides of the scale, some things are of less value (to some markets) than the cost of pr
2.
AI is a self-esteem test(mvrckhckr.com)
1 points by mvrckhckr 6mo ago|0 comments
3.
Signups Are Lying to You(mvrckhckr.com)
1 points by mvrckhckr 6mo ago|0 comments
4.
by mvrckhckr 6mo ago
It’s always been the case that if you sell results that are obviously cheap for the customer (you give measurable value that’s a multiple of your fee), your sale process was much easier.
5.
Every venture is either a commodity or a brand(mvrckhckr.com)
1 points by mvrckhckr 6mo ago|0 comments
6.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
It’s a personal choice, and both early and late(er) can be valid rational choices if it’s you who is making the choice and not just following a crowd (or even a single person).
7.
We're writing agent grammar before the language exists(mvrckhckr.com)
2 points by mvrckhckr 7mo ago|0 comments
8.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
Great idea and execution. I like your thinking.
9.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
It’s ironic. I also doubt the validity of the AI writing detection.
10.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
The best way I can describe the approach I take is having the ability to "smell" what the AI might have gotten wrong (or forgotten completely). It happens all the time, even when I only scan the code or simply run it and use it. I
11.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
I agree, and it's context-dependent when to use what (the author mentions use cases for other solutions). I'm glad there are multiple solutions to choose from.
12.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
What a great idea and nice execution.
13.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
Only major media can get away with this kind of bloat. For the normal website, Google would never include you in the SERPs even if your page is a fraction of that size.
14.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
This is still great after more than a decade.
15.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
That sounds like a very good environment. There are always restrictions, just maybe not major and/or ones that seem arbitrary.
16.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
Wasn't it automatically used when it was implemented?
17.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
AI is a tool. It is humans who abdicate their responsibility (and thinking).
18.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
I think it’s dishonest to use a paying client as a test subject for fundamental functionality they pay for, without their prior consent.
19.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
That's an interesting angle. I'm not sure I see the direct connection, but it can be a user choice.
20.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
In that case, why introduce the feature in the first place?
21.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
If you know it exists and becomes popular, in the right situation you will make sure to have it. The dynamics don't change with this.
22.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
Interesting and simple idea to implement. Any actual evidence agents actually use it?
23.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
My Bluetooth headphones are great and very rarely have any glitches. I use wired headphones only when listening to high-resolution lossless music (using the right hardware). I would guess the fact that some streaming platforms have these no
24.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
These were always personal preferences (I’ve used all types at different times and contexts), and I don’t think AI will have any major effect on their usage numbers.
25.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
I never get to more than 20% of the 1M context window, and it’s working great. (Have the same experience in Codex with 5.4.)
26.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
A business has the right to set the rules by which it is willing to contract with you. You don’t have to buy their product or service. Trade only works well by mutual consent.
27.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
Unless they have "the right equipment". Then you are right back at the same situation.
28.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
The only reason I can think of for this change is governmental pressure. I don’t see how it benefits the platform itself (nor its users).
29.
by mvrckhckr 7mo ago
I find that restrictions not only don't kill creative work, they enable it. Measuring anything makes you consider constraints, which helps foster better creativity - at least for me, and I see the same in others as well.