Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mvkel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
151.
▲
by
mvkel
7mo ago
Having contempt for someone because of how much money they have (or have not) is not a virtuous trait
152.
▲
by
mvkel
7mo ago
The patterns were there if you knew to look for them. The original Digg excepted, Kevin Rose's attention span is extremely limited. He will give something ~3-4 months of attention before (apparently) getting bored and wanting to move o
153.
▲
by
mvkel
7mo ago
Ahhh, AI. The perpetual cover for "we over-hired in Covid times and are now correcting for that." Makes you look innovative.
154.
▲
by
mvkel
7mo ago
It's as if people forgot about the MacBook One (anagram: Neo) from 2015 (which I daily drove for a year and loved). I suspect the Neo will sell about the same, and be forgotten in as many years.
155.
▲
by
mvkel
7mo ago
> The model isn't wrong — it's just optimizing for the wrong signal. sniff sniff I feel like I'm going insane.
156.
▲
by
mvkel
7mo ago
Weirdly, LLMs seem to break with these instructions. They simply ignore them, almost as if the pretraining/RL weights are so heavy, no amount of system prompting can override it
157.
▲
by
mvkel
7mo ago
Accurate info on what? Most markets have almost no liquidity, outside of sports and crypto
158.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Development isn't hard on ram. Doing what Apple claims this device is designed for, spending lots of time in multiple browser tabs, is.
159.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
It's strange that the low-end machines get positioned as "every day task" devices when the biggest ram hogs by far are browsers and websites.
160.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
It's more that they can't think of anything else that could possibly need that much compute.
161.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
> disassembling, evaluating, and feeding back ... listened, iterated, and shipped. they didn’t declare victory and go home. They kept pushing. Not even an attempt to clear the ai smell out of this piece.
162.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
I mean, given your very specific filter, how many companies exist today that were formed in the last decade would be on the list? Stripe?
163.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
It's more like "Tesla is going to be bankrupt imminently" all over again. Name a time in history when a company with an industry-defining product with huge demand failed under the weight of cash flow, or regulation. Frontier
164.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Profit is what you do when you're not trying to grow. Name a time in history when a company with an industry-defining product with huge demand failed under the weight of cash flow, or regulation.
165.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Anthropic and OpenAI are shipping AI agent SaaS and generating tens of billions in revenue. It's safe to say yes.
166.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Excited to try this. Is this not in effect a kind of "pre-compaction," deciding ahead of time what's relevant? Are there edge cases where it is unaware of, say, a utility function that it coincidentally picks up when it just
167.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
It's more that I'm allergic to hypocrisy.
168.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Again, these are just words, and they're a salad of legal terms of art that provide cover for virtually any action. "We prevent the -illegitimate- use..." [define illegitimate plz?] In your second link, that team was defunded
169.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
That's my point. They formed anthropic under the sole mandate of "guardrails first," now seemingly don't have them at all. So they're just another ai company with different marketing, not the purely altruistic outfi
170.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
for sure. If they weren't so self-righteous about not serving ads, it'd be a great revenue stream for them. It'd also align with Dario's seeming obsession with profitability
171.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
The "safeguards" you are referring to are contractual, i.e. words. There are no technical safeguards, per the article. The memo literally says that the reason they have these policies is -because- actual technical guardrails are n
172.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Are the guardrails not part of their core? Isn't that the whole premise of their existence?
173.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Should probably look up how many private companies are suing the government at any one time because of a breach of contract. And that's publicly breaching. NSA and other three-letter agencies happily do it under cloak and dagger.
174.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
"as an ai safety company, we only believe in -partially- autonomous weaponry" Ads are coming.
175.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
These are literally words. The DoW could still easily exploit these platforms, and nothing Anthropic has done can prevent it, other than saying (publicly), "we disagree."
176.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Good optics, but ultimately fruitless. If preventing mass surveillance or fully autonomous weaponry is a -policy- choice and not a technical impossibility, this just opens the door for the department of war to exploit backdoors, and anthrop
177.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Convenience trumps everything, including privacy and security. Tell the average person that they have to install their own model is a deal breaker at the outset. As for 99% capabilities being on device, battery life makes it a non starter.
178.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Regardless of their intent, this is the opening move in a ratchet that only turns one direction. Platforms almost always begin with "90% of users will never notice," then gradually expand scope as regulatory pressure, liability, a
179.
▲
by
mvkel
8mo ago
Good question! It serves as a bootstrap for each module design file (effectively a deeper expansion of what is defined in the PRD). Once you have (at least) design files for each module, PRD is no longer necessary. It usually ends up being
180.
▲
Coding Consistently with Agents in 2026
(mykel.org)
3 points
by
mvkel
8mo ago
|
2 comments
More ›