Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
muyuu
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
181.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
i reckon the push will get to the point that us Europeans will end up actually installing it because all major OS's will enforce it
182.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
it's the kid they are up against to, but not the kid who "needs" it
183.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
it is obviously enforcement by proxy, trying to pretend otherwise is laughable but then again so is most of the shilling supporting this legislation
184.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
i'm afraid that model is making a strong comeback in the so-called free world
185.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
optionality already exists and works very well you can install very tight parental controls on many devices but this is not about optionality, this is about forcing the mainstream into verification and certification schemes that most people
186.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
these things are insidious once vendors are forced to put on hooks to some enforced age verification system, it will creep everywhere like cookie banners which you cannot escape even in Antarctica
187.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
I'm not American but it seems to me like both things are violations, which is troubling because you enter into the disturbing necessity to start carving exceptions obviously these regulations are very different, but both do compel spee
188.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
the action of forcing any sort of verification or certification on devices or operating systems this is taking the parental control largely into their own hands
189.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
that is why democracy ends at property
190.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
this is why the vector of attack of "think of the kids" is almost always the first when it comes to try to lock down the internet in some way it's "protect the kids" or "counter-terrorism" and nowadays als
191.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
> all attempts at controlling the Internet will converge on surveillance and censorship, which is why all this stuff matters it really boils down to this sadly, and it should be pretty obvious shouldn't it? i'm finding it befud
192.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
it says that, but the action of hardening devices effectively contradicts what it says to be charitable, let's say that it "enhances" parental controls by taking on some of that parental enforcement at the state level
193.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
ok, that is the argument with merit in favour of shielding kids from the internet - now let's consider how does it look like when the locus of responsibility is governments it's true that kids are vulnerable to certain forms of co
194.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
a kid who can install Linux, or set up an ssh tunnel to a seedbox, is a kid who doesn't need to be told by the government what he or she should be watching that is the job of parents/guardians
195.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
it's MUCH worse now, not just because of the massive amount of code generated with zero supervision or very little supervision, but also because of the speed at which the systems grow in function
196.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
> Under "Your rights" section on the UK government website you can see that it grants you rights, so people have good reason to believe that: https://www.gov.uk/data-protection you are soft in the head if you b
197.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
my only experiences with chatbots so far have been as instruments for companies to avoid their contractual obligations and just not provide the options that I would have asked a person directly for obviously not a problem with the technolog
198.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
you didn't get to read all post did you there are bits, but the total package is cancer
199.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
i've caught a lot of heat in the UK where i live for my position on GDPR, which is that i completely reject it, because people seem to believe it's there to protect any rights if there's anything remotely good with GDPR is th
200.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
I'd have said the same a few months ago, but looking at the code quality that the SotA LLMs right now I have to say it's excellent and the problems they have are not with the language but with the subject problems, esp. when they
201.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
Depending on the specificity of the research, having a model with fewer parameters will come with a higher penalty. If you want a model to perform better at something specific while staying smaller, generally it will take specific training
202.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
There won't be meaningful controlling of the technology vs the government. If it's there it will be used, just like in China. Let alone when multiple players come close enough of SotA. This never happened with any technology out i
203.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
looking at the news right now... i don't know about that
204.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
how much of a clean room can you claim when you don't know exactly what code has your LLM looked at? love the project of course, but LLMs are a huge caveat to such claims, which will be very hard to make credibly in the future for anyt
205.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
We'll get to the point, if we're not already there, where you won't be able to tell if the artist actually did the work or just could have done it, and to which extent. Everything in the process can be essentially faked. If y
206.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
> He did write it. he did not, the LLM did it > I too would worry if it were you doing it. i would not worry about anything you do, because it's obvious you would never get to that point
207.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
the trust element to me is jumping into a port, not specific code although code you didn't write in a language you're not an expert with, will ALWAYS introduce an added risk of falling into pitfalls you can only avoid with experie
208.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
people really believe this coordinated push across jurisdictions is about kids and verifying their age? this excuse to try to end pseudonimity on the web is as old as the mainstream internet itself to a lot of people it never sat well that
209.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
I did, and the point stands because reading someone else's code is not the same as writing it, esp. when you're not able to do so to the same standard
210.
▲
by
muyuu
8mo ago
in case it's not glaringly obvious from the comment, he has plenty of cpp experience and little rust experience, and that's according to his own comments the relevant bit here is that he's porting from a language in which he
More ›