3 ms·
I did, and the point stands because reading someone else's code is not the same as writing it, esp. when you're not able to do so to the same standard
by muyuu 8mo ago
I did, and the point stands because reading someone else's code is not the same as writing it, esp. when you're not able to do so to the same standard
- jibal 8mo agoNon sequitur. Again, no trust was involved, only verification through extreme testing. Also, as others have pointed out, "someone with no experience" simply isn't true.
- muyuu 8mo agothe trust element to me is jumping into a port, not specific code although code you didn't write in a language you're not an expert with, will ALWAYS introduce an added risk of falling into pitfalls you can only avoid with experience, the more the merrier you're banking in the LLMs quite strongly when you do that, which may just work but i would be very worried about myself if i were in his boots
- jibal 8mo ago> code you didn't write He did write it. > you're banking in the LLMs quite strongly when you do that, which may just work but i would be very worried about myself if i were in his boots I too would worry if it were you doing it.
- muyuu 8mo ago> He did write it. he did not, the LLM did it > I too would worry if it were you doing it. i would not worry about anything you do, because it's obvious you would never get to that point
- jibal 8mo ago"It" was the C++ code ... you don't even understand what you yourself wrote. > i would not worry about anything you do, because it's obvious you would never get to that point Childish whatabouting and projection. I will never respond to you again.