muscache

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   Neuralink and the Brain’s Magical Future (2017)(waitbutwhy.com)

   2 points by muscache 4y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   by muscache 4y ago

   Okay, you can call it a messaging service then. I don't think spending time on nomenclature is worthwhile; and "email service on the blockchain" would be clear enough for most :)
3. 3.▲
   by muscache 4y ago

   I've used Disroot in the past! (Also Autistici/Inventati, etc). A few reasons: - You are relying on the creators to run it fairly and not change their principles [0]. For us, it is impossible to not run it fairly because code, onc
4. 4.▲
   by muscache 4y ago

   There is nothing that needs to "get past Google's filters" because the email never goes to Google - it is stored on-chain
5. 5.▲
   by muscache 4y ago

   Sorry, I believe you misunderstood the idea. You are not sending emails to eg., Gmail via Stenzor. You are sending email to _other_ people also using Stenzor. Blockchain is a closed-loop system and there is no way to call to 3rd party servi
6. 6.▲
   by muscache 4y ago

   One deterrent is simply that sending email is not free, you pay about a cent per email (this is the blockchain fee and not imposed by us) Second, we will have a allow/denylist that will ensure you only get mail from people and companie
7. 7.▲
   Show HN: I'm building an email service on the blockchain

   1 points by muscache 4y ago|16 comments
8. 8.▲
   Show HN: Generate typed and efficient APIs from a schema file(github.com)

   3 points by muscache 5y ago|0 comments