mupuf

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mupuf 6y ago

   Thanks for the feedback, everyone! I fixed up quite a few things based on it! I'll keep on working on the code and hopefully will have some more tangible to share at the end of the summer :)
2. 2.▲
   by mupuf 6y ago

   Thanks for your write-up! In the case of FPGA boards, OSHW would thus require "mechanical drawings, schematics, bills of material, PCB layout data, and integrated circuit layout data" given that no HDL source code is present in it
3. 3.▲
   by mupuf 6y ago

   My understanding was that open hardware stood for "open PCB design", with the idea that a community could be made around it to improve the design for later revisions. Open toolchains are another topic, and indeed, Lattice FPGAs ar
4. 4.▲
   by mupuf 6y ago

   Yeah, I definitely jumbled both in the same basket. I should rename that into "higher-level languages" and introduce both HLS and HDL there. Thanks for the feedback, I'll make some changes to clarify my thoughts!
5. 5.▲
   by mupuf 6y ago

   Thanks for the links. I'll make sure to check them out in details!
6. 6.▲
   by mupuf 6y ago

   Sorry about that, the project is still very early. Check out the fan_wip branch for actual code. The point of LiteDIP is to provide both the IPs, and their drivers. Also, rather than needing IPs to be located at a certain address in any sor