multjoy

9 ms·

151.
by multjoy 1y ago
In the bill that has recently been passed, the republicans have inserted a clause that means no administration official can be found guilty of criminal contempt by the federal courts. This will mean that the courts are literally powerless a
152.
by multjoy 1y ago
It's entirely relevant. If you've chucked a prompt at ChatGPT and called it a day, the output is an approximation of human thought. There is no originality, it is text vomited onto a page that may, or may not, resemble human creat
153.
by multjoy 1y ago
No it doesn't. It makes them average. It regresses as far as it can to the mean because that's what it does. It has no creativity, it cannot think. It has no idea what is right, only that it can make your input look like the corpu
154.
by multjoy 1y ago
They don't need to be awesome, they just need to write their own words. If someone can't be bothered to write the copy for their project, what else have they handed over to an LLM?
155.
by multjoy 1y ago
If you’re not going to write it, why should I read it?
156.
by multjoy 1y ago
https://www.crowdsupply.com/krakenrf/discovery-dish
157.
by multjoy 1y ago
Do you value the lives of infants so poorly that you think a PDF will do it?
158.
by multjoy 1y ago
Bring back the <blink> tag.
159.
by multjoy 1y ago
Speaking as a fraud detective, it appears to be completely ineffective.
160.
by multjoy 1y ago
It may well consult any source about the topic, or it may simply make something up. If you don't know anything about the subject area, how do you know if you are asking the right questions?
161.
by multjoy 1y ago
How do you know that ChatGPT is teaching you about the topic? It doesn't know what is right or what is wrong.
162.
by multjoy 1y ago
Lotus Notes enters the chat
163.
by multjoy 1y ago
I don’t know if the US shares a great deal with UK armed forces, but an officer ignoring a senior NCO, especially one training them, does so very much at their own peril. It is far more likely to be something like cognitive overload rather
164.
by multjoy 1y ago
404 Media did an interview with the owner: https://www.404media.co/sales-of-hard-drives-prepper-disk-fo...
165.
by multjoy 1y ago
And if you fancy making your own… https://github.com/unkyulee/micro-journal
166.
by multjoy 1y ago
They did. They went to a judge and got a warrant.
167.
by multjoy 1y ago
They were allowed to gather the evidence - they had a warrant from a judge. The judge erred, not the police.
168.
by multjoy 1y ago
Peaceful solution to an invasion? How does that work, exactly?
169.
by multjoy 1y ago
>Putin is one of the main supporters of holding elections there Because he will interfere, like he has across Europe. He is a tyrant and has only his own interests at heart.
170.
by multjoy 1y ago
They’re literally fighting for their lives. Nobody wants elections in wartime, not least because polling stations become targets. You need to lay off the MAGA talking points.
171.
by multjoy 2y ago
Because ANPR data isn't routinely monitored. If your car is up to date on tax and insurance it doesn't generate an alert, the presence is recorded and ignored. People make journeys that are illogical all the time and ANPR misreads
172.
by multjoy 2y ago
><The department issuing traffic citations requests an automated daily report showing every vehicle observed at multiple locations where the two sightings imply an average speed between 55MPH and 170MPH. Then the citations department
173.
by multjoy 2y ago
I don't, so my sample set is distinctly broader than yours.
174.
by multjoy 2y ago
That’s no good to the victim, is it.
175.
by multjoy 2y ago
Disclosure is a very different beast today, fifty years later.
176.
by multjoy 2y ago
Entirely contrived. The point of the system is that you want all the hits everywhere, if your system is using any discard rules at all then it is unreliable for a prosecution.
177.
by multjoy 2y ago
That's literally not how government works. If they explicitly discarded data because it was exculpatory then not only would they not be able to fine you based on that data, they would have to refund every fine they issued while that di
178.
by multjoy 2y ago
The point of mandatory third party insurance is so that when you drive through the putative crowd of children waiting for the bus, the state and the victim's families are not on the hook for lifetime care costs which can easily be in t
179.
by multjoy 2y ago
Why? What would be the point of that?
180.
by multjoy 2y ago
A better guide is the Crown Prosecution Service's disclosure manual: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/disclosure-manual

More ›