muhit2002

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by muhit2002 13y ago

   A. Because it’s not easy to remove GIL according to Guido van van Rossumn. It’s an issue and the fact the python community are talking about it means concurrency is an issue. B. Your last comment points to one language and the complexity of
2. 2.▲
   by muhit2002 13y ago

   Whilst they may have thought of concurrency problems in the 80s as you outline, the problem of concurrency (and subsequently performance) appears to be a bit more genuine now. Processing power has peaked...fact. Now with most PC's bein
3. 3.▲
   by muhit2002 13y ago

   But hasn't CPU speed peaked? Moors law? Meaning that future performance is going to come from concurrency? Abdul Muhit
4. 4.▲
   by muhit2002 13y ago

   Guys, Not sure how it got picked up, but i don't think it's a creppy stalking of my profile...in fact i am flattered. Thank you for your feedback. Couple of things that I think is worth adding here: 1. This article was the first a