muhbags

10 ms·

1.
by muhbags 8y ago
I feel the exact same way. Never will anything in my home needlessly connect to some cloud service and give away my data. And even less would I be willing to pay for that...
2.
by muhbags 8y ago
It is definitely useful, but it severely reduces readability in my opinion. Your example is also a great example for this. The first version in way more readable than the second version with the walrus operator.
3.
by muhbags 8y ago
I am in the exact same situation. I moved to Canada from Europe and it has been really tough thanks to three measly weeks of vacation. I can't remember the last time I have been on a real two+ weeks vacation somewhere that is not my ho
4.
by muhbags 8y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the standard model makes no prediction for the masses of any of the fundamental particles. To my knowledge, they are all input parameters. It might put certain bounds on them, but in the end they are all no
5.
by muhbags 8y ago
Finally no Python 2.7 anymore!
6.
by muhbags 8y ago
Never. It's either no units (theoretical physics), eV (particle physics) or Kelvin/Celsius for experimental physics.
7.
by muhbags 8y ago
I don't really get this argument. People will still want to own their own car to use whenever and whereever they want. If one currently owns a car, I don't see that this would change just because one doesn't have to drive any
8.
by muhbags 8y ago
Frankly, I think the country that one should be the most concerned about pulling off a first strike is the USA, not China or Russia...
9.
by muhbags 8y ago
Looks about right for early high school math.
10.
by muhbags 9y ago
The standard model is definitely flawed in a couple of known ways.