muep

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by muep 2y ago

   It's indeed an inconvenience with developing with Flatpak, but assuming someone still wants to do it, here's what one can do to make it practical (as far as it can be): Get your development tools as a flatpak runtime extensions Tr
2. 2.▲
   by muep 2y ago

   Instead of desiring atomic maps, would it work here to give each task its own map and then merge those after the parallel processing has ended? I have have absolutely no experience of CUDA, so no idea how applicable that approach would be.
3. 3.▲
   by muep 6y ago

   Oulu, a 200k town in Finland, claims to have 600 km. It still could do with some more bike paths and improvements to the existing ones, but it is at a level where almost all places are reasonably easy to access by bicycle.
4. 4.▲
   by muep 9y ago

   E.g. Fedora has for years been using for RPi the same close-to-mainline kernel source that is used for other ARM boards and x86-64 and any other supported hw platform.