Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mrweasel
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
241.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Part of that potential profitability is reportedly coming the fact that they get a discount on compute from SpaceX in May and June. Anthropic and SpaceX signing a contract where Anthropic leases datacenter capacity for the low low price of
242.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Of cause there are some who see boost in productivity and other advantages of AI, but I'm questioning the current AI models ability to produce code (and text). If all the promises were true, we'd see an increase in code quality, b
243.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
It suggests that "kill $(lsof -t -i:3000)" is completely safe, which it's not, if you don't know what runs on that port. Maybe some Javascript framework runs on that port, I don't know, but neither does the AI, the
244.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
That's my line of thinking with the "bundled into some other solution". It doesn't make a ton of sense for an individual to buy API access, but other companies could provide a service built in the API, and they are the o
245.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
When Cariad had a data leak, they were really quick to point out that no payment information had been leaked. That really shows how little they understand about PII. Screw the payment information, I'll just cancelled that card and get
246.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
How is this a tangible income stream? I suspect that the amount of customers willing to pay for some weird API access or We Connect offering is rather limited. It would have to be bundled into some other solution, which again I'd guess
247.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
I didn't look into the numbers myself, but Ed Zitron claimed in his podcast that the only reason Anthropic looks sort of profitable was due to some rather clever accounting (not illegal) and a spending that didn't happen, I think.
248.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
While I'm not opposed to the idea that Google AI mode is so good that people use it more, I also feel like the average person only have so many queries per day. Google statement would indicate that people had a number of queries that t
249.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
> I truly don't get Google's move. Users aren't adopting their AI at the rate shareholders expect, so they now force the adoption at the cost of search.
250.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Not really, it's slimy because it should be obvious that it's the morally wrong thing to do. There's no tangible benefit to the users, only risk. The fact that they only opt-out EU users, because regulation forces them, tells
251.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Typically if you develop a software product for a company, the company resumes responsibility. No one would develop anything for any high risk business, if they were to assume personal responsibility of the end result. LLMs don't reall
252.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
In our case we're completely allowed to use AI, but if you do, you carry the responsibility for it's output (not in a legal sense obviously). So if your LLM says "Sure, go ahead and run that code" and it deletes the prod
253.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Well, they're doing an excellent job then.
254.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Are you suggesting that people have bots answering question on place like AskReddit in an effort to nudge society in a certain direction? That would explain why much of Reddit, Instagram and Facebook is so completely unhinged, but that is j
255.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
The internet isn't going to die out, but it feels like it's becoming a place where you go to do a specific task and then you check out again. One interesting observation from myself: I don't "browse" the internet an
256.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
For something like customer service, I can understand why an AI would be deploy, not that I think it should, but why are so many running things like Reddit bots? A few bots here and there for experimentation, sure, but as someone else point
257.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
It looks a little like the Apple Magic Mouse from some angles, only more ergonomic.
258.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Corporations are afraid of taking chance, and Ives have been elevated to this design guru for his work at Apple. This is despite the fact that he clearly had some terrible designes approved at Apple, but no on had the balls or status to tel
259.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
> that's also why i am not working with windows Oh good, so it's not just me. Windows is weird, my hand starts cramping up and I start getting angry pretty quickly when I use it. For LLMs, I just can't use them, they aren&
260.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Those where everywhere in the late 80s, complete with 80W incandescent light bulbs. I'm not suggestion that it can't catch fire, but even if it did wouldn't the paper would burn so fast that not enough heat is generated to ig
261.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
The Vitsoe shelving is the goal for my office, but the initial cost is just so high. I know it will last me the rest of my life, and I should just have bought it when I first wanted it 15 years ago. The chairs in front of the desk might be
262.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
How would that help with pricing? The cost of hardware is already subsidized to hell and back by investors and that's not dropping costs enough. I'm not concerned about Uber, they are way to big. I'm thinking sub 1000 employe
263.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
It so weird, because you're not the only one and I absolutely believe, but I can't do it. Any interaction I have with an AI ends in anger. I get stupid non-sense results and hallucinations time and time again or the machine simply
264.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Okay, but what if you're not Microsofts size and don't have and R&D budget large enough to fund development of your own models and tools? This is a warning to any company, not building their own AI, that AI assisted developmen
265.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Honestly I think they are being a bit naive and assume that the scrapers gives a shit. A few of the large AI companies might care enough to set up a custom solution for you, assuming that your dataset is sufficiently large. Most doesn'
266.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Seeing people still using Google is, perhaps not surprising, but perhaps a little sad. Google still dominates search, while providing one of the poorest search experiences. The fact that they can continue to dominate on momentum alone is cr
267.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
> Since when have we considered ads something helpful? At some point Google ads where genuinely good and helpful to me. If you needed to buy something, and you didn't know who sold it or what it was called, the Google ad engine woul
268.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
I understand very little of this, but hasn't OpenAI burned so much money, which it now need to be recouped, making any profit short or long term is mostly a fantasy. If OpenAI IPOs, then investors will expect a return. OpenAI can'
269.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
Never thought about Amazon, but I did completely expect Facebook to tank. Apparently I underestimated their level of deviousness and willingness to manipulate people. I don't even think I want to take a guess on OpenAI. I just don'
270.
▲
by
mrweasel
5mo ago
It's a lovely browser, and a lot of work has clearly been put into it. I should like it, because I used Opera for ages (in the Presto era), but it's just a little to busy for me. There's way to much stuff, to many feature and
More ›