mrparrot

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mrparrot 3y ago

   The worrying part is that the winning entry would bust immediately if someone wrote a single test to check if the computed numbers are correct. I'm not sure what I find more disconcerting: That the judges considered this a feasible att
2. 2.▲
   by mrparrot 3y ago

   Last year there was a brief period where the same ticket cost 9€/month. It was a success but discontinued for mainly political reasons. There is a fund however where you subscribe for 9€ and if you get caught riding without a ticket th
3. 3.▲
   by mrparrot 3y ago

   I think what you say might be true. I once found a dumbed down version which goes like this: (A simplified version of Mia [0]) On your turn, you secretly roll a die and then make a statement about what number you rolled. The next player may
4. 4.▲
   by mrparrot 4y ago

   But with this argument you could blackmail someone whether or not you have some evidence.
5. 5.▲
   by mrparrot 4y ago

   That is a fair point and I realize that I do remember some facts because the questions on the respective exams were, in my opinion back then, terrible. I would, however, consider most of these facts trivial by now. Still, it has played a ro
6. 6.▲
   by mrparrot 4y ago

   Testing information retention is fine. But the information "The textbook claims A is the correct answer" is not worth remembering, is it?