Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mrlala
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
181.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Here's what I don't get about this.. I've seen all these various claims, and to be frank I did uninstall tiktok just recently as I only enjoyed it for about a week or so then lost interest, and there's all this stuff com
182.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
I wouldn't watch them though, I was flipping away pretty quick. Hard to explain exactly, just saying that it really seemed unusual. Again it was also the amount that were coming up. I watched a descent amount of BLM related videos a
183.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
>Decades after the last case went cold, investigators announced in 2018 that DNA led them to a break in the case. Detectives submitted the killer's DNA to an open-source genealogy website called GEDmatch, where it found a hit with a
184.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
I was skeptical about this, but I think they are surely are. I installed tiktok just maybe 2 or 3 weeks ago.. it was kind of fun at first and was amused by some stuff on there. What it was showing me I thought was very relevant to prior st
185.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
>Steam isn't a monopoly though Are you a pc gamer? Because if you are, I don't understand how you can't see Steam as a massive monopoly. Perhaps you don't because they have done almost all GOOD with their monopoly pow
186.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Honestly how often does anyone use the start menu these days? I am on windows all day long for analysis/development, anything I actually use is just pinned to the taskbar (like osx). And when I do have to use the start menu to find som
187.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Why can't you just download Godot yourself https://godotengine.org/download/windows and grab the 64-bit mono c# version?
188.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Asking the same question myself right now.. I was playing around with Gamemaker Studio yesterday and it seemed ok at first for something simple, but suddenly realized just how stupidly simple it is.. seems like it will be a pain to have any
189.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Uhhh.. what? Like, can you give some examples?
190.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
It's even more amazing that you take the time to comment about this.. why do you care so much about the unit specified?
191.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
It's baffling that you are comparing the death rate that happened DURING A LONG LOCKDOWN with a non-lockdown annual flu death rate.. and acting like if we can drop the numbers a bit it's the same thing. Your logic is essentially s
192.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
>allow high performing students to objectively differentiate themselves Except the argument by people is it's NOT objective. I think the argument goes something like this: rich kid gets full time tutor privately or through school a
193.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
This! Especially f'in dropbox.. swear to god everytime you try to click on a file it does some type of request to try to "help" you. Which is fine, but it gets slow as hell. I have a brand new very fast machine and all the s
194.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
It taking like 1gb of ram in chrome. Your point? I literally just clicked on a link, downloaded a few assets and was into an online FPS. Virtually any modern computer in the world no matter what OS/browser should be able to do the sa
195.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Doesn't the overhead view look like it's all in a 3d model basically?
196.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
But, but, but, if you don't write in C and manage your memory you are not a real programmer! Says slashdot/HN...
197.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
They can press the privacy button which will ignore the current poop.
198.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
>Couldn't even get a proper health care bill passed. Perfect? No. Hell of a good start? Yes. Ever heard of pre-existing conditions? Well not anymore. That fucking ALONE is worth all the mess that everything took. You realize that
199.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Of course not- and that has nothing to do with the situation I was talking about. I was giving an example where the worst case was still "good" overall. You are giving an example where the worst case is "bad" overall.. s
200.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
>Any studies involving UBI need to have malicious actors as a part of the study. Yes, and no. Of course there will be some low form of abuse and whatever.. that is just a given with anything in the entire world. It should NOT be a main
201.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
I would have to say "it's not".. anything non-encrypted you risk being manipulated by a node of the TOR network. I bet there are people who act as relays just to try to sniff out any good non-HTTPS traffic.. although, I supp
202.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Does that actually make sense to you?
203.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
I still find this to be such a silly comparison, really. CNN is a publisher.. they pay people to be on TV, they pay people to write articles. Of course CNN (the company) is liable for what it puts out, because they are literally creating 1
204.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
I can believe that- otherwise why would you try to continue to scam/spam someone over email who is clearly trying to unsubscribe.. meaning they realize it's spam/scam. The goal is to find people who don't know any better
205.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
Eh I wouldn't say clicking an unsubscribe is engaging in the same way at all. Wouldn't someone who is like "this is spam, get me off the list" be way LESS likely to be a good scam target?
206.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
>or a bad outcome I ardently want to avoid (letting a spammer know my address is active). Honest question- why does this really matter? Or at least matter to any degree where you would rather have more junk mail than potentially stop sp
207.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
>I'm not sure how much more embarrassed I can get for my country. Just wait until tomorrow, and the day after that, and the day after that...
208.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
>generally only in one direction Do you think it's really a coincidence that the side that promotes racism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc is the side getting 'censored'? Seems like a natural result to me.
209.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
What, how do internet freedom advocates want this? Are we next going to say google is responsible for the search results it provides, when it's just indexing the internet and returning the best match algorithmically? HN is going to sta
210.
▲
by
mrlala
6y ago
I'm not disagreeing with you, but on the other hand.. why? Not sure I understand why something more difficult to read is supposed to be 'better' from a technical standpoint.
More ›