mrfox321

15 ms·

121.
by mrfox321 5y ago
P/E does normalize by market cap. Earnings is actually earnings per share.
122.
by mrfox321 5y ago
As fraudulent as being able to lend at an arbitrary multiple of your reserves. A run the bank would bring it all down. Just like in real life.
123.
by mrfox321 5y ago
Basketball players are really synchronized https://youtu.be/DZJbFwc4fks
124.
by mrfox321 5y ago
It should exist, in theory, but the type becomes moot in the presence of any dynamic input.
125.
by mrfox321 5y ago
even older people are starting to use it.
126.
by mrfox321 5y ago
So I was looking at SotA loss functions from a few years ago that weighted the CTC loss by the WER of the decoded phrase. Could we generalize the WER weighting to optimize for the domain? Something like weight = w1 * WER + w2 * phonetic sim
127.
by mrfox321 5y ago
The main issue is that quantum mechanics and {special | general} relativity are non-intuitive. Any classical analogy is a leaky abstraction at best. There are communicators who can pierce through this effectively. However, they tend to be
128.
by mrfox321 5y ago
HIV has evolved to be less deadly: https://www.pnas.org/content/111/50/E5393
129.
by mrfox321 5y ago
You are just saying that interacting systems have phase transitions. I think this is a far cry from "emergent numbers". Edit: Maybe self organizing matter that lives on a phase transition boundary benefits from being aware of the
130.
by mrfox321 5y ago
Shouldn't language predate money? Language or cave paintings or whatever, use discrete symbols to describe physical reality
131.
by mrfox321 5y ago
Your argument is tautological. Do we really know if adaptation is responding to discrete classifications of environmental pressure? There could be other ways to describe how systems adapt. You are ascribing a lot to how you think it emerge
132.
by mrfox321 5y ago
Does "easier" equate to "universal". I think it does, just thinking about your statement out loud. Since to humans, explaining numbers with hydrogen would be harder, I think. The common ground between humans is larger,
133.
by mrfox321 5y ago
Diablo 2 monster sound effects always seem to show up in random places.
134.
by mrfox321 5y ago
ketamine? weed once your frontal lobe is developed?
135.
by mrfox321 5y ago
Source? I am quite intrigued by this anecdote for information retrieval.
136.
by mrfox321 5y ago
Your blackjack outcome is independent of other player's decisions. This is a statistical fallacy.
137.
by mrfox321 6y ago
When you say calc-heavy, you are speaking about just cranking the wheel or number crunching? What type of exposure would have prepared you better? HS obviously won't prepare you, so this is speaking more towards uni curriculum.
138.
by mrfox321 6y ago
ODEs don't have feedback either. Their evolution is a function of it's point-in-time state, just like Recurrent nets. But, you can build great priors with a well-modeled ODE
139.
by mrfox321 6y ago
I would argue the gains are "fake" if the inflation of spending of the investor class tracks the market. In other words, we see inflation in private school tuition, homes, etc, that is correlated with this bull market.
140.
by mrfox321 6y ago
For one, Arrow is columnar. The idea of zero-copy serialization is shared between Arrow and FlatBuffers.
141.
by mrfox321 6y ago
This always happens. Post about X. Somebody replies with, "look at my Y". Usually off topic and trying to take advantage of the posts visibility.
142.
by mrfox321 6y ago
You can use webRTC VAD or the VAD from RNNoise. https://github.com/xiph/rnnoise
143.
by mrfox321 6y ago
Yeah that part wasn't worded very well. The process is nonlinear, necessitating a quadratic taylor expansion, at least.
144.
by mrfox321 6y ago
I wonder if brain damage/CTE has something to do with it.
145.
by mrfox321 6y ago
Google maps improved their worse-case residuals of traffic estimation using GNNs (messaging passing Nets, not graph embeddings).
146.
by mrfox321 6y ago
Look at the bright side, it will take less time to catch up than it took them to build the foundation!
147.
by mrfox321 6y ago
Oh don't get me wrong, I'm taking you seriously. But it's also hilarious!
148.
by mrfox321 6y ago
Haha I forgot about grad student control. Apologies, this is definitely a quantum computer operating on yearly timescale qubit flipping.
149.
by mrfox321 6y ago
everything requires a measurement of the physical world. A hurricane's initial conditions cannot be absolutely specified and controlled. A system of qubits can. Edit: The research cannot currently control the circuit that defines the
150.
by mrfox321 6y ago
By your logic, all classical computers are measuring voltages and calling them bits. A computer is just an experiment, right? All of the awesome things we build with computers are just propaganda.

More ›