mrbait

3 ms·

1.
by mrbait 3y ago
A friend used to work part-time at KFC, roughly within your parameters.
2.
by mrbait 3y ago
No, it's based on rumours about some local old ladies' begging syndicate. My point was about efficiency though.
3.
by mrbait 3y ago
You can trivially make €500/mo as a beggar, but it's extremely time inefficient. In other words, how much time you have per week?
4.
by mrbait 3y ago
Man, do I love programming language comedy. This is probably the best I've seen since Dreamberd. I may biased though. Just the "Zápis" and "Popis" column names make me smile because of my mother tongue, which is suf
5.
by mrbait 3y ago
It seems to be Swedish in origin, in which case the closest English equivalent would be "mee" or "mew". Roughly speaking, the <y> here is close to what is traditionally transcribed in English as [i:], except rounde
6.
by mrbait 3y ago
Is automatic register allocation necessary? Would anybody contest that? Procedures? In and out parameters? Return values? Pointers? References? Integers? Signed? Unsigned? Structs? Unions? Arrays? Goto? Loops? Do you enjoy implementing vari
7.
by mrbait 3y ago
These all are excellent questions for someone making a systems language, but that's not quite what I had in mind. I'm more interested in surveying the boundary between systems and application languages, rather than exploring the d
8.
by mrbait 3y ago
Oh yes, automatic stack is a good one! How do you think automatically managed strings might work, so that there is as little hidden code and costs as possible, but still decently ergonomic for your taste? Would you consider automatic string
9.
Ask HN: What is must-have for a systems programming language?
8 points by mrbait 3y ago|11 comments