mr_justin

11 ms·

61.
by mr_justin 17y ago
I'm not seeing that at all. Normal page refreshes, no anchor in the URL.
62.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Is it really important in this case? Just so a bunch of different companies can fawn all over him because he said "I'm looking for work, contact me"? If you have the skills (he does), finding a job should not be too difficult. No need to bl
63.
by mr_justin 17y ago
That was something I read recently in an article about Neil Armstrong's humbleness. He felt it was unfair to take any credit when there were 400,000 people who made it possible for him to take those steps. It's a good read and gives a lot o
64.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Nonsense, working on a modern vehicle requires specialized tools (in some cases), a computer (in many cases) and patience. If you enjoy working on cars, then you get whatever you need to get the job done. If you don't, then you just complai
65.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Because the JavaScript engine in 3.0 is lightning fast compared to the 2.x engine and the 3.5 is ummm, faster than lightning. By a heck of a lot. For me personally, the only reason I downgraded back to 3.0 from 3.5 is because Firebug 1.4 is
66.
by mr_justin 17y ago
By "intro to stats" do you mean the calc-based stats class that most people in CS take? I'd hardly call that an intro class considering you need to complete Calc I & II before enrolling.
67.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Looks great in Safari beta 4.
68.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Structures that earn the designation "historical" require certified craftsman for all repair work. It costs significantly more than typical home construction and therefore increases costs greatly.
69.
by mr_justin 17y ago
If it was a 17,250-square-foot, 14-bedroom mansion, I'm pretty sure it wasn't just some random ramshackle home from the 20's. But that is just an assumption.
70.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Hardly a news worthy item, but it always saddens me when I hear of an old historic home being demo'd. So much history and lost craftsmanship, gone at the hands of a wrecking ball.
71.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Both of those are pretty minor and not very wide spread. Especially so for the second mistake.
72.
by mr_justin 17y ago
That's true, but in addition they are showing tweets that were published post making the account private. I have verified this with a friend who has their updated locked. I am not following them but can still use search to see what they are
73.
by mr_justin 17y ago
I like to be able to stop "following" somebody without them being aware of it. I like following to work like RSS. Only I know who I am watching.
74.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Looking back, it's funny to see how long it took them to make the whole A-Z connection that finally appeared in the 2000 logo.
75.
by mr_justin 17y ago
I wasn't using search before, maybe I said that wrong. Before, I had an account and followed more people than I cared to keep up with (the you follow me, I follow you problem) then the celebrities came and really turned me off. So I deleted
76.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Did you read that post or just glance over it? By not so obvious pitfalls I was talking about the conscious vs. subconscious effects things like this has on us, which was the entire point of the article.
77.
by mr_justin 17y ago
This is an excellent read, very well thought out and clearly identifies the not so obvious pitfalls of doing things like Matt Aimonetti did in his presentation. When I first saw the "Just another Wordpress blog" default template, I was skep
78.
by mr_justin 17y ago
"Macs are the best computers for a lot of people, but not for software developers." That is just plain false. Installing packages (that either don't come with OS X or just override the installed version) is a piece of cake. Without Ports.
79.
by mr_justin 17y ago
It's funny you mention the "Oprah factor". I'd been feeling more and more skeptical about twitter the days leading up to the day Oprah showed up there. That was the peak of the celebrity wave, and it completely did me in. That night I delet
80.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Easy there, probably just a developer debug message checked into production by mistake.
81.
by mr_justin 17y ago
You're not honestly suggesting that developers start using flash to render their body content, are you? Besides the copy/paste argument that people have already mentioned (yes, I know there is a "solution"). It's also inaccessible, takes lo
82.
by mr_justin 17y ago
Isn't the meta description tag's purpose to describe the page? It's not intended to describe the entire website, which is what you are insinuating.
83.
by mr_justin 17y ago
So where do you work? Is it: A) A fantasy land B) A college computer lab C) Develop intranet apps for a small company
84.
by mr_justin 17y ago
> Making IE users experience worse also pushes people toward other browsers That is simply false. The average internet user should not have to make that leap of faith. They simply will think your website/app is crap and they will stop u
85.
by mr_justin 17y ago
I don't know, people having been doing this sort of thing long before Get Satisfaction was around. The average web user is very lazy.
86.
by mr_justin 17y ago
> On non-IE browsers, the difference in speed is negligible Are you suggesting that people develop two versions of their JS? One for IE and one for everyone else? Just to appease the pedantics of JS DOM manipulation? For small bits of H
87.
by mr_justin 17y ago
A very interesting article, but poorly written. The first paragraph is filled with disjointed thoughts "It's not a story .... Nor is it just the story .... It's also the story". It's not, or it is? "The main issue was an agreement over how
88.
by mr_justin 18y ago
Hmm, I tried 10-20 times and MXHR was always slower. Sometimes a full half-second slower. I had some times approaching 1-second load time, meanwhile the "normal" load was consistently between 350-400ms. I know it's just a proof of concept a
89.
by mr_justin 18y ago
Unless I'm reading their demo wrong, their technique makes the page load slower (for me anyway): http://demos.digg.com/stream/streamDemo.html Normal is consistently under 100ms and MXHR is around 400ms (using Safari 4 beta, OS X)
90.
by mr_justin 18y ago
The definitive book is Designing with Web Standards. Not all CSS per se, but it is requisite reading if you're just getting into the whole CSS-based design thing. That book goes hand in hand with Eric Meyer on CSS.

More ›