mpolichette

10 ms·

61.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I like this one more than our modern equivalent: `covfefe`
62.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I'm not on Zuck's side, and I'm not explicitly saying you're wrong, but this feels like a mix up of the response from Zuckerberg to blocking the Twitter API. If you have a source for him saying "Yup do it" to a
63.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I'm not arguing against the CST format, but I don't think redundancy is necessarily bad or hard to work with. It can be good because each line is now an independent idea and doesn't require the indentation context, the items
64.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I am not convinced GDPR is a bad thing yet... What makes you think it is?
65.
by mpolichette 8y ago
This is really interesting and I agree, but I think only addressing facial recognition is missing the forest for a tree. There is an underlying idea here of a person owning information about themselves and having control over it and makin
66.
by mpolichette 8y ago
So, this is the start of westworld?
67.
by mpolichette 8y ago
If you already have a consistent design language,and those pre-baked pieces, it seems like assembling them visually is the easy part. This would still leave the behavior logic an data flows. I’d be interested to see new things like this th
68.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I do think this kind of UI needs an animation, but I don't think its necessary for that animation to be slow. I too feel like I'm waiting forever for it to "get there". The other thing I don't care for is that it
69.
by mpolichette 8y ago
Serious question, I'm wondering, why you, personally, value other people getting MBA/Engineering degrees over arts? I really enjoy going to the theater and seeing performances of all kind, just as I like tech/business advan
70.
by mpolichette 8y ago
Getting the problem fixed is about culture as much as anything else. If there is some legacy reason something cannot be fixed and has to keep returning bad data, then yes, there is 100% a reason to have two endpoints that do the same thing.
71.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I agree with this. I’m all for writing checks against values which may be optional, but I don’t litter my logic with checks against code that should provide the appropriate data. If you’re getting bad data you need to address the issue hig
72.
by mpolichette 8y ago
Didn't realize it was a joke, got frustrated and left after 2 clicks and left... decided to check the comments... you win.
73.
by mpolichette 8y ago
Yeah cause our companies love to let third parties “analyze” our code.
74.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I would make the argument that price is part of the product... No one cares (or at best you'll have a really limited market) if you can't make your product affordable.
75.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I'm not aware if this is a public or private prison... but does anyone know if that would matter? Would a private prison be required to evacuate and do whatever it takes to move the prisoners safely?
76.
by mpolichette 8y ago
For living? There’s a lot of choice, I love sugarhouse which is where I am. It’s close enough to hit downtown without being in the “heart of it”. Which, in slc is still not that much... you can easily choose to be further or closer to downt
77.
by mpolichette 8y ago
SLC, Utah is pretty great, I almost don’t want to mention it because the tech jobs are great and the state provides a lot to do.. its like a hidden gem no one thinks about because they consider it Mormon land... There are a lot of companies
78.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I don't understand the desire for all the git integration into the editor. I mean, it might make sense because Atom is owned by Github, but why otherwise? I feel like a lot of their resources are being put towards git integration inst
79.
by mpolichette 8y ago
We used this for docs at a previous job... It was nice at the time... since not a lot of tools supported markdown. However, in hindsight it sucks... all that documentation is so much harder to read in things like githublab... Those things r
80.
by mpolichette 8y ago
Thats neat, cool, given that, we are at least only as susceptible as we were before.
81.
by mpolichette 8y ago
The argument in that article is that it doesn't matter what is in the source. The published package has no guarantees to be from the source.
82.
by mpolichette 8y ago
I cant help but think of the post about stealing password credentials from the site you build by surreptitiously inserting extra code into the published NPM package. Except wasm packages seem like they'd be even harder to detect. htt
83.
by mpolichette 9y ago
If you have a web service counterpart you should consider looking into webrtc... the sdp exchange can happen through your site and then they will connect directly
84.
by mpolichette 9y ago
I've always wondered about this... if an EM field is composed of photons which have higher energy than light, how come I've never seen image/video captured where the device is 'glowing' or something as a photon sour
85.
by mpolichette 9y ago
When I did an internship at a national lab, a lot of the hard rules about security relied on the fact that you had gone though their hiring process and would follow the rules. There were different access levels, for sure, but only like 2
86.
by mpolichette 9y ago
Super nit pick: Is it just me or is it a bit disheartening that they have defined this using the term `thru` which google defines as `informal spelling of through`? Isn't a legal document about as formal as one can get? I'm just
87.
by mpolichette 9y ago
I very much appreciate Troys approach to criticism. It gives the other party a fair rebuke but also treats them as the fallible humans they are. People make mistakes, and I feel like out society should be a little more lenient sometimes,
88.
by mpolichette 9y ago
I like this idea. I keep hoping that a solution with peer to peer networking can help us overcome the problems we have with ISPs owning and controlling all of our access to the internet.
89.
by mpolichette 9y ago
I would pay $5 a month to have all physical junk mail filtered out of delivery. Why can't I opt out of "or current resident"?
90.
by mpolichette 9y ago
I wish it were so simple to remove economics from things. Unfortunately, the problem isn't the need (the demand), its the supply. We don't just have unlimited clean drinking water, and as soon as there is a constrained supply, w

More ›