motoxpro

8 ms·

91.
by motoxpro 1y ago
We're in agreement. I was just saying I don't support 3rd parties scraping my data so as they just get yours and not mine then have at it!
92.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I agree that that is what the word and phrase means, however in THIS context, it means something different. It doesn't ruin the idea if the idea is to share that it has easter eggs. If they didn't create, share and "ruin&quot
93.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I think they we're just defining what Easter egg meant in this context. The fact that it has an "Easter egg," in this context, is more of a more meta nod, rather than it being a hidden thing you have to find, since that is a
94.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I guess that was my point, YOU are free to export your data and post it on the internet, but don't make everyone (me) do the same.
95.
by motoxpro 1y ago
If everyone has access to your data it becomes even more worthless and you will definitely not get aid for it. At least now I can keep it somewhere and they can use it to fund engineers to keep the service up, lawyers to make sure your data
96.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Selling data inside their walled garden in a way I am OK with in exchange for a free service. Not a 3rd party selling my information to a scam farm in a foreign land that has no laws that will use all of that information to extract money fr
97.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I think most users don't want their data to be used by anyone and everyone. I sure don't. If one user needs access to their own data, they can always export it and take it where they please. For most people the dangers of openness
98.
by motoxpro 1y ago
So pay ~$30 a month (the LTV of a user on facebook). No way.
99.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I'd point to Wikipedia. You can say the content is "wrong". But the links go to the right place.
100.
by motoxpro 1y ago
People in this thread saying that this is the kind of content kids like should go on tiktok for a sec. This is not at all what young people watch, it's just bad content, and misunderstanding that feels out of touch.
101.
by motoxpro 1y ago
In this situation, humans are more accurate, for now, so it's good information to have. Same as I would like to know if humans self assessed in a study about how well they drive vs the empirical evidence. Humans just aren't that g
102.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I agree. The sibling responses also give some insight into why a lot of people don't get a lot of value out of coding agents.
103.
by motoxpro 1y ago
As things tend toward commodity (e.g. one item being replaceable with another with not much, or no, difference) the thing that matters most is brand. So to the contrary, ChatGPT has the ONLY moat so far. 5.8B page visits vs 148m and growing
104.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I really hope this doesn't catch on. Having ever random site on the internet being able to see every bit of my data sounds like a nightmare. Unless I am misunderstanding something.
105.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Yep. CEO of YouTube, Google Cloud, etc.
106.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Ah I see, I should have read it more clearly. Makes sense why they are up!
107.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Thank goodness. Them spinning that out would have been a nightmare. Bad day to be Apple. Edit: I just checked the stock, I had no idea people priced in a split with that much certainty.
108.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I understand he is big in the niche space. I also am into guitars. But comparing Rick to Taylor is like comparing HackerNews to Facebook. Her money/power/audience is at least 4 orders of magnitude more than what he has. Which is w
109.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I guess (a) with what money and (b) with what time. Unless you are Taylor Swift, people wont watch the exact same content on a different platform just becasue you told them to when it exists on the one they like. More importantly (c) why? I
110.
by motoxpro 1y ago
You're assuming a ~5% conversion rate and usage/payment in perpetuity. Those are just unrealistic assumptions, based on my experience in this space. Everything breaks. - Channel makes no money because sponsors don't pay (as
111.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Neither the GP or this comment are viable in the real world. Businesses/creators need continued distribution, see Nike as an example of what happens when you "take your audience elsewhere to monetize them better/more." 1
112.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I had the opposite reaction, in that it seemed exactly like those three things. Sans the years of development on each but the idea seems really clear. "Build Linear, but the person who does the work is Claude and the 'state'
113.
by motoxpro 1y ago
They exist already. The more basic solution is for the non-profit to just add the info. Grab a squarespace template and just type in the info. If anything, someone should just make an AI that sucks in all the things she mentioned and add it
114.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Here are some things that are already built that do what you are building: https://github.com/bvaughn/react-virtualized https://github.com/bvaughn/react-window https://tanstack.com&#x2F
115.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Definitely to each their own. I will never have a job at a YC company and I will also never apply to YC, so the ads are completely useless. I did discover some of my favorite shoes from an IG ad, though. It wouldn't ever be worth me ge
116.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I don't think that's true. It's not that has zero value, it's that it has zero monetizable value. Hackernews is free. The posts are valuable to me and I guess my posts are valuable to me, but I wouldn't pay for it a
117.
by motoxpro 1y ago
Totally. I mean at this point Elon has 1000s of hours of practice doing interviews, pitches, presentations, conferences, etc. See Sam Altman in this context.
118.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I don't know how many conferences you have been to but most talks are painfully bad. The ones that get popular are the best and by people who love speaking, hence why you are seeing them speak (selection bias at it's finest) They
119.
by motoxpro 1y ago
I get you. I think for me, just knowing what is probably on the teleprompter, and what is not, I am willing to bet a lot of the "wooden" vibe you are getting is actually NOT scripted. There is no way for people to remember that 20
120.
by motoxpro 1y ago
It's better marketing and more credible to have the researcher say "We think GPT 5 is the best model for developers, we used it extensively internally. Here let me give you an example..." than it is for Matthew McConaughey to

More ›