motorest

29 ms·

511.
by motorest 1y ago
> The way to reduce the risk is to diversify. Taiwan with a China risk and the US with a "US risk" is much safer than either alone. Not really. Taiwan with a China risk means China has pressure to not change the status quo. US
512.
by motorest 1y ago
> Not when people are being absolutist rather than taking the situation for what it is and doing the best they can with it. The US is threatening NATO partners with invasion and annexation, not to mention the moronic tariff war, and you
513.
by motorest 1y ago
> China is actively supporting the Russian army. They don't want Russia to lose. It can't be more clear than this which country is a greater danger to the West. The Trump administration is overtly cutting support from Ukraine w
514.
by motorest 1y ago
> perhaps lot of european people need to have a wake up call. You haven't been paying attention. Even to this thread. Let me be very clear: The US proved to be a very unreliable and outright hostile partner. At this point, it is not
515.
by motorest 1y ago
> Right , just to remind that China is the country that supports Proxy wars with west (...) The current US administration directly and very overtly threatens two NATO members with invasion and annexation. I personally can't interpre
516.
by motorest 1y ago
> US has been a reliable partner post WWII for 95%+ of the time. The current US administration has been threatening two separate NATO allies with invasion and annexation. Not even Russia, with their daily Russian last warnings of nuclear
517.
by motorest 1y ago
> I meant with EU Russia and Ukraine. Do you believe Russia and Ukraine are a part of the EU? > Plus, France and German economies were also connected before WW2 and that didn't stop the war. Even if we ignore the complete ignoran
518.
by motorest 1y ago
> I meant how did that ensure peace between Ukraine, Russia and EU? There lies the source of your confusion. The EU was designed to prevent wars within Europe, not between outside members. Do you think that NATO bombing Kadafi represents
519.
by motorest 1y ago
> If that is the cost of keeping the value within the western economies, we should pay. Plain and simple. I'd even argue it's cheap. No, that is not the cost of keeping "the value" within western economies. It would b
520.
by motorest 1y ago
Thank you for posting here. Always insightful, always a treat.
521.
by motorest 1y ago
> Source code is not designed to track and management issues and make sure they get prioritized, so you shouldn't be using your source code to do this. Indeed. Who in their right mind would think it is reasonable to track relevant t
522.
by motorest 1y ago
> Tracking in external system adds overhead not only for filing the issue, but also for triaging it, backlog management, re-triaging to see if it's still a problem, and then closing it when it's finished. Filing the issue can t
523.
by motorest 1y ago
> This is why regulating AI is needed, otherwise you're putting life decisions into the equivalent of the magic 8 ball you shake for an answer. Why are you putting life decisions on a LLM?
524.
by motorest 1y ago
> What ever happened to measuring speed, cadence and pedal force using your body and mind? How do you export a time series of that?
525.
Evolution of HTTP(developer.mozilla.org)
2 points by motorest 1y ago|0 comments
526.
by motorest 1y ago
> That doesn't really prove that much. You seem confused. France launched a criminal probe, whose goal is to investigate whether these types of biases reflect actual manipulation from Twitter. You are presented with evidence suggest
527.
by motorest 1y ago
> X are simultaneously saying they've not been made aware of the allegations, but that they deny the allegations, and that the allegations are politically motivated. What a time we live in, where things like antisemitism and suprema
528.
by motorest 1y ago
> A bot went off the rails, and was subsequently corrected. How sure are you about that? I mean, it is more likely that the bot overshot how it was expected to push propaganda. Musk is on record expressing disagreement with how LLMs are
529.
by motorest 1y ago
> But disproportionately propagating far-left content is cool. Twitter was already caught hard coding rules to downrank content that reported Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and Russia has been continuously conducting a destabilizatio
530.
by motorest 1y ago
> That's the main problem with vibe coding. It's not a problem. It's in fact the core trait of vibe-codig. The primary work a developer does in vibe coding tasks is providing the necessary and sufficient context. Hence the
531.
by motorest 1y ago
> A good trial would be pointing an LLM at Jira and telling it to finish the backlog. GitHub is already rolling out this feature. https://github.blog/news-insights/product-news/github-copilo...
532.
by motorest 1y ago
> If you are far from an expert in the field maybe you should refrain from commenting so strongly because some people here actually are experts. Your opinion makes no sense. Your so called experts are claiming LLMs don't do vibecodi
533.
by motorest 1y ago
> JavaScript doesn’t even have file system support.. https://nodejs.org/api/fs.html
534.
by motorest 1y ago
> Cool. How many "complete, fully working" products have you released? Fully featured? One, so far. I also worked on small backing services, and a GUI application to visualize the data provided by a backing service. I lost coun
535.
by motorest 1y ago
> Haha, wait until you hear how long and how many people it takes to change the text for a single button at a company like Google I feel this is a needlessly obtuse statement. I'll explain you why, as I've worked professionally
536.
by motorest 1y ago
> Vibe Coding seems to work best when you are already an experienced programmer. I think that is a very vague and ambiguous way of putting it. I would frame it a tad more specific: vibecode seems to work best when users know what they wa
537.
by motorest 1y ago
> I assume in this case you mean a broader conventional application, of which an LLM algorithm is a smaller-but-notable piece? Not necessarily. If you prompt a LLM to limit changes to some projects or components, it complies with the req
538.
by motorest 1y ago
> Even with typescript Claude will happily break basic business logic to make tests pass. It's my understanding that LLMs change the code to meet a goal, and if you prompt them with vague instructions such as "make tests pass&q
539.
by motorest 1y ago
> They'll never be fit for purpose. They're a technological dead-end for anything like what people are usually throwing them at, IMO. This comment is detached from reality. LLMs in general have been proven to be effective at ev
540.
by motorest 1y ago
I think you're showing some despair in trying to avoid addressing the fact that there are indeed bugs. There is nothing suggesting bugs are obscure or random. You have a list of examples. Is it hard to acknowledge the problems are ther

More ›