Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mosura
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
Is the subtext that Demis was trying to block what Dean etc wanted to do and so they had to leave Google in order to do it?
62.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
That is actually cool. Maybe it is my bubble, but the experience people are having with Anthropic particularly is motivating a big “get this stuff back under control” effort so while it may not be strategically optimal for Cloudflare the lo
63.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
So you can run it off the public internet with no sneaky external dependency on cloudflare, slack etc? And it would be functionally the same? With the same performance if you put enough hardware there? If so cool, and that should have been
64.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
They also provide cover to those doing the dirty stuff which drives the need for their other products. Not remotely paranoid.
65.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
Sandstorm without self hosting has no interest though. (Edit: see below, where the creator states it _can_ be run locally) Buzz looks like a more reasonable direction than this does.
66.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
We have now passed the point where the AI bots were annoying. Now it is the reactionary “everything even possibly slightly remotely tangentially connected to AI must be deplatformed” rants everywhere that are even worse. It would be temptin
67.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
The bad words police are the actual authoritarian nutjobs. That is the problem.
68.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
Someone should use this to do the exact opposite of the intention: filter for “offensive” content, and boost it or collate it into a newsletter/email blast for people of culture. You have to give it to Mistral they do at least know wha
69.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
What is curious is Apple quality was much higher when they were secretive. The idea that it is a drag on productivity is self evidently wrong based on results.
70.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
One of the things mentioned was specific metal finishing techniques for manufacturing. The implication being at least some of this is to do with OpenAI making consumer hardware, as designed by Ives.
71.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
A key part of this is it has to be conspicuously deliberately AI.
72.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
At that point why have images at all? Just go full American Psycho eggshell business card.
73.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
No one is reading your blog anyway, they are looking for the video.
74.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
Kind of amazing Airtable couldn’t turn vibe coding in Airtable itself into something worth charging for. But they have had a distinct lack of imagination for a very long time.
75.
▲
by
mosura
2mo ago
Luma is the current version of that idea so yes.
76.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
The EU way is to think these things are “free” and then act surprised by the inevitable consequences five years later when it is irreversible. Our AI gods cannot save us soon enough.
77.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
The whole SV “let’s go to burning man” crowd has always had a very active sex aspect to it. This is one of the things neo puritan pichai era Google struggles to deal with about its past.
78.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
I look forward to you submitting all agency to your superintelligent AI overlords. For your own good, and the good of society!
79.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
Don’t worry, with the progress in AI we will build BR (for blocked reality) goggles which will obscure anything you have considered possibly objectionable from your environment and replaced it with something innocuous.
80.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
Not remotely. Let people check authenticity of the source and make their own private decisions. The entire problem is fraud, and governments are hardly immune from that.
81.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
And even worse “customer utility” isn’t real but perceived. It is more important to make the buyer feel the solution helps than anything else.
82.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
Skip to the end. Let the consumer verify that the product is the unmodified intention of the entity claiming to have produced it and let them decide if they trust it. Tangent: it is notable that certain variations of labelling of that sort
83.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
> Where’s the feeling of accomplishment in making them if you just told an LLM to shit something out? Like, who would bother? Exactly. Find something else to do. From this perspective the mere existence of AI tools for this stuff devalue
84.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
> Proper authors, journalists and artists are, generally, not keen The AI Scotsman fallacy.
85.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
> Adversarial review loops of N parallel agents looking at whatever characteristics you care about will make it better Especially if different model providers. It becomes more like having team members that see things slightly differently
86.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
Yeah the financial value of a codebase is in successfully solving a problem, which is independent of code quality. It is a painful lesson for many.
87.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
This misses the forest for the trees. The important question is digital provenance so you can verify it came from the entity it claims; whether the entity you trust used AI is not the point. Plenty of people were not to be trusted before, o
88.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
GitHub has been especially bad. Ultimately they have become a monopoly so it is kind of expected.
89.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
I am not advocating that, since I am an accelerationist, but basic reading comprehension is obviously a problem for you both here and in your other trolling efforts. (He has since edited his comment to remove the direct claim I was personal
90.
▲
by
mosura
3mo ago
Once AI is achieved it will not be a question of “adaptation” but “acceptance”. You are in denial. If you don’t like this the answer was what the Unabomber proposed the whole time.
More ›