moshetanzer

4 ms·

1.
by moshetanzer 8mo ago
Yeah that is what we also figured. We are using https://forwardmyinbox.com which works quite well.
2.
Ask HN: How are you handling Gmail ending POP3 and Gmailify?
4 points by moshetanzer 8mo ago|4 comments
3.
Show HN: Forward My Inbox – IMAP‑to‑Gmail Forwarding After Gmail Kills POP3(forwardmyinbox.com)
2 points by moshetanzer 8mo ago|0 comments
4.
Ask HN: Why do we wait for PR to review obvious slop
1 points by moshetanzer 9mo ago|1 comments
5.
Ask HN: Why does it still make sense to review stupid bugs at PR time?
3 points by moshetanzer 9mo ago|3 comments
6.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
Ask HN, It feels increasingly backwards that PR reviews are where we catch basic bugs, style issues, and convention violations. With AI writing a large chunk of code now, the volume of small, avoidable mistakes has gone up. Yet we still wai
7.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
https://commitguard.ai code reviews that are faster than linter that auto run pre commit and fully configurable.
8.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
Most code review happens at PR time, after code is already written, tested, and context is gone. With more AI-written code, tests pass but logic issues still slip through. Would earlier, pre-commit code reviews make more sense? I’m explorin
9.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
Hey.
10.
What do you think about a "linter" for code logic?(commitguard.ai)
1 points by moshetanzer 9mo ago|1 comments
11.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
Linters are great for style and syntax, but logic errors still rely heavily on human review. Do you think a linter for code logic - for example: risky condition changes, missing error handling, inconsistent early returns, or unsafe null&#x2
12.
Just updated CommitGuard's landing page, does it explain the product?(commitguard.ai)
1 points by moshetanzer 9mo ago|2 comments
13.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
Hi HN, I spent some time improving the CommitGuard landing page to make it clearer and more direct about what the tool does. I’d love your honest feedback, does it make sense at a glance? Any suggestions for improvement? https://
14.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
Yip this won’t help them. Though I sure help there aren’t a lot of them ;)
15.
Show HN: Commit-based code review instead of PR-based(commitguard.ai)
15 points by moshetanzer 9mo ago|4 comments
16.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
i like the idea v nice
17.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
its not :)
18.
New code review tool I made(commitguard.ai)
1 points by moshetanzer 9mo ago|3 comments
19.
by moshetanzer 9mo ago
I have found that PR based code reviews are two noisy and non configurable. Also unpredictable as to when they will run or if all is ok. Also it is never clear who’s problem it is (more like no one is intrested in dealing with it or it is j