moshei

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by moshei 9y ago

   I suggest you look at this: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ Using the term mutilation when it is most often used in that context is absurd.
2. 2.▲
   by moshei 9y ago

   http://www.dictionary.com/browse/mutilation
3. 3.▲
   by moshei 9y ago

   I would disagree that the foreskin performs an essential biological function, and by the dictionary definition that would not make it mutilation.
4. 4.▲
   by moshei 9y ago

   By the age you would be able to consent (between 13 and 18 years depending on country) it would be a major surgical procedure involving days or weeks of pain, not the few minutes a baby experiences. Babies are remarkable in their ability to
5. 5.▲
   by moshei 9y ago

   Calling this mutilation is absurd, I am circumcised and so is my son - it was way more traumatic for me seeing, then it was for him feeling t - many babies do not even cry. I suggest you do a little more research on what genital mutilation
6. 6.▲
   by moshei 12y ago

   Technical Writer - Johannesburg, South Africa - Onsite, Remote or permanent part time We are looking for a talented technical writer to help us improve our suite of documentation and training materials. Skills & Duties * Ability to
7. 7.▲
   by moshei 12y ago

   Egis Software (www.egis-software.com) - Johannesburg, South Africa or Remote We are looking for a talented senior developer to help us grow and scale the various products in our commercial product suite. You will be part of the core team bu