mortallywounded

23 ms·

271.
by mortallywounded 3y ago
Not only was the early code consistent with itself, it was messy as hell and full of "Windows-isms" which reaked of academia/not-a-fulltime-engineer.
272.
by mortallywounded 3y ago
Personally, I believe Len Sassaman is the likely candidate for Satoshi. I know the "evidence" is largely circumstantial and coincidental timing... but when you take it all in it's a bit much.
273.
by mortallywounded 3y ago
What's the alternative? State on the backend, html, and client side code?
274.
by mortallywounded 3y ago
I was surprised to see a gov.uk page on progressive enhancement and their thoughts on it ( https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/technology/using-progressi... ). I asked on HN yesterday if PE was dead and everyone seems
275.
by mortallywounded 3y ago
The only thing I learned is there's a lot more people like me in the local community than I thought. Which was good because I went there to meet people, not to learn :)
276.
by mortallywounded 3y ago
I recommend going to some meetups and meeting other solo founders/creators. I recently went to a Microconf meetup ( https://microconf.com/ ) and met 30-40 other solo creators and had a blast.
277.
by mortallywounded 3y ago
I tried DBeaver recently and thought it was pretty nice. I tried it as an alternative to Beekeeper.
278.
by mortallywounded 3y ago
There are a good number of people making a living from desktop apps. However, many of these desktop apps are actually web apps in disguise (Electron, Tauri, etc). The number of actual desktop applications making money are shrinking, but non
279.
Ask HN: Has progressive enhancement lost of the war?
12 points by mortallywounded 3y ago|10 comments