Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
moring
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
151.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
Related: CAST analysis http://sunnyday.mit.edu/CAST-Handbook.pdf Intended to focus on maximal learning about all factors that contributed to an accident. It subsumes several approaches, including a blameless analysis and th
152.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> these FAANGs should set up some way for folks to make money through curation of their content (patented, TM, etc) Not sure what you mean by "patented, TM, etc". Other than that, I think this should already be possible from th
153.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
The cost is in loading the bounds (e.g. array size) from memory. If you access 100 different arrays, you get 100 load operations for the sizes. A register would only help if you access the same array in a loop, but the majority of loops doe
154.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
First, please clarify whether you are asking about performance impacts vs. no bounds checking or vs. bounds checking in software. The "vs. no bounds checking" deals with the fact that the bounds must be stored somewhere, so you ge
155.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
You might find the coding for selenocysteine interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SECIS_element tl;dr: selenocysteine doesn't have a normal coding as a base triple, but as re-interpretation of a stop codon d
156.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> Don't do this unless it is obvious why it is grayed out. Commands should be left enabled, then an error message should be displayed when the command is clicked and the command is unavailable, and in this case explain why it is pre
157.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
There is always the discussion whether the UI should "hide the implementation details" (make the internal model, which differs from the conceptual model, invisible -- resulting in hard-to-understand behavior) or "make the imp
158.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
I have seen a case of Software QA taking a very different shape, so I'd like to argue that the outcome you describe is not intrinsic to software QA, but rather to company culture. The case I'm talking about does not have a separat
159.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
The pattern in general is called "event sourcing", but unfortunately it's popular enough to make a lot of bad articles appear, and I can't recommend a good one.
160.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> And there's the belief that "tech skills" = "knowing where the Windows buttons are". OK, that is true in a limited sense, that "x competency" = "familiarity with x", but the point is you can
161.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> I think it’s worthwhile to be able to say “we could solve the problem if it weren’t for X” so we can talk about why “X” is the way it is. Fully agree. But we shouldn't confuse “we could solve the problem if it weren’t for X” with
162.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
I was assuming that the original topic was about the US, so my apologies if we were just talking about different countries here. So to be more precise: Is the problem a simple one in the US? If so, what is the solution? Or, in case you were
163.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> This is such a lazy argument. You can't write out in this moment how to solve this <insert large problem here> therefore it's too complex to solve. I wasn't arguing that the problem is too complex to solve, and in
164.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> (...) and the biggest problem is that many, if not most, affluent people don't want to solve the problem in the first place for either ideological and/or financial reasons, which in the American plutocracy means this will nev
165.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> Build housing would be a great start! Markets don't care about low-profit cheap small apartments, so there's no supply and the demand isn't being met, so it's the mission of the state to step up and compensate this
166.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> You would need to introduce an equilibrium encouraging money system and prevent the extraction of land rents. Those things are never going to happen, because they are too obvious of a solution. If these two action items are "never
167.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> Homelessness is a society-wide self-inflected wound: it could be stopped in a few years, but that would be landlord gentry's biggest nightmare. I think you are making the same mistake as the author of the article. Can you describe
168.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
The author almost, but not quite, reached the point where they realize they contradict themselves: Claiming that socialized healthcare would cure cancer, but not explaining how to move the US to socialized healthcare (nevermind that countri
169.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
The criteria for removal are clear on paper, but impossible to meet, so the effect is the same. It is impossible to meet because the reason why the proverbial fence was put up is, more often than not, a mixture of misunderstandings, logical
170.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
I found this to be the best visualization for me: https://omgspace.net
171.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> These are basically tech demos at this point. I disagree with this conclusion. Crude as it is, Copilot _does_ make me faster in practice, even though I have to proofread its output. I think this also agrees with your second statement,
172.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
The parts I didn't understand where those spoken with a different voice, like "subject name here", and it's mostly because I'm not a native english speaker.
173.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
I could never decipher these lines (they just sounded like "mumble mumble" to me), and now it makes sense. Have a cake as a "thank you"!
174.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
This only solves the second example (the "map" one), but not the first example because it doesn't contain any promise-returning function that throws.
175.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> Why would you pose the question if you already biased against the answer? Why would you pose _this_ question if you are already biased against the answer? :) But to answer your question: 1. to question your own bias. You might get an a
176.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
This doesn't solve the issue at all, does it? If Promise.all() is never reached, neither is Promise.allSettled().
177.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
One thing I have recently stumbled upon is that the way Promise.all() is commonly used is "wrong" in the sense that it is prone to uncatchable promise rejections (which cause both Node and Deno to exit the whole process by default
178.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
> Restricting your choices in life, can often lead to good outcomes. The article isn't about somebody restricting their own choices in life, but about the Nepalese government restricting others' choices in life, which is an e
179.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
I'm not convinced about that. Writing a formal contract for a function is incredibly hard, much harder than writing the function itself. I could open any random function in my codebase and with high probability get a piece of code that
180.
▲
by
moring
3y ago
AI only highlights how ridiculous the hiring process is. A program that generates likely word sequences determines whether or not you get the job? What is even the point of that? The company looking for employees would be better off looking
More ›