> These are basically tech demos at this point. I disagree with this conclusion. Crude as it is, Copilot _does_ make me faster in practice, even though I have

> These are basically tech demos at this point. I disagree with this conclusion. Crude as it is, Copilot _does_ make me faster in practice, even though I have to proofread its output. I think this also agrees with your second statement, that progress will come in small but useful improvements. If you treat Copilot like improved auto-completion, then it is very useful today. Actually, while using syntax trees as the underlying model is a very interesting approach, there is still a lot of low-hanging fruit to make Copilot much more useful than it is today, just in terms of performance (waiting 1-2 seconds to see if there is a completion, and if it makes sense, interrupts my typing flow) as well as low-level features (e.g. mark and insert part of a suggestion, instead of inserting the whole and then removing the wrong parts).