moralsupply

31 ms·

91.
by moralsupply 6y ago
For me, the way it should be is as simple as: - Take notes in markdown format - Commit to a private Github/GHE repository
92.
by moralsupply 6y ago
Is there a software less clunky than Anki out there with similar functionality?
93.
by moralsupply 6y ago
I can't stop hitting the space key
94.
by moralsupply 6y ago
That's not correct. Python will never be as fast as hand-optimized assembler, but it certainly can be much (5-10x) faster that what it is right now for most workloads. Pypy is a living proof that it can be done.
95.
by moralsupply 6y ago
In other words: Tesla slashes the resell prices of all its cars by 50%
96.
by moralsupply 6y ago
I wonder if you're a troll or if you really believe in what you wrote
97.
by moralsupply 6y ago
I wonder what's the current state of desktop on OpenBSD
98.
by moralsupply 6y ago
Except that the release of toxic or radioactive substances cause definite harm, as opposed to walking around without a mask, which doesn't cause harm (unless you assume all people are sick and/or everyone carries viruses and are v
99.
by moralsupply 6y ago
So you mean that all libertarians are "very much fringe" and "Kock-like entities"? Also, Hayek was not a collectivist. Maybe you should read The Road to Serfdom again, as he refers to "collective responsibility&quot
100.
by moralsupply 6y ago
What if I disagree and at the same time I don't harm anyone? Would you live with the idea that I may have my freedoms and property arrested by the government in order to make you supposedly safe? Benjamin Franklin once said: "Thos
101.
by moralsupply 6y ago
I'm not sure why would you mention Ayn Rand in this context. Since you proposed some studying, here are a few books on the subject that I'd suggest to you: Lysander Spooner, No Treason The Constitution of No Authority https:&#x2F
102.
by moralsupply 6y ago
The idea of a "causal nexus" is not accepted in any law system (natural or positive). The fact something can happen due to your actions can't be used as an ethical argument to limit your freedom of action. From the perspectiv
103.
by moralsupply 6y ago
The only really sad thing is that so many people believe others should be forced (through the use of the monopoly of force the state holds) to do whatever they believe is "right"
104.
by moralsupply 6y ago
https://fee.org/articles/the-eugenics-plot-of-the-minimum-wa... . > Whatever the intentions, the effects are still the same. On that the eugenicists were right. The eugenics movement, however evil its motive, underst
105.
by moralsupply 6y ago
Definitely not. Any government interference in the market will lead to distortions and malinvestments, not "increased competition" -- unless you believe that giving unfair advantages to Apple competitors is acceptable by any stand
106.
by moralsupply 6y ago
Users accept the app store EULA, which serves as a contract, and in which Apple states it can shut down content according to any standards they desire. That means users are fine with Apple removing podcast apps that talk about whatever Appl
107.
by moralsupply 6y ago
> Apple's rules oblige app vendors The rules only oblige app vendors if they agree with that contract. Users also only engage in doing business with Apple on a voluntary basis. That's not extortion, by definition.
108.
by moralsupply 6y ago
Are you saying that you're fine to use the government's force against a company that is not causing harm to anyone just so that you benefit from that intervention (and in complete disregard to all users who are happy to pay for Ap
109.
by moralsupply 6y ago
Apple doesn't have to support other stores. If users don't like that idea, they can simply not use Apple products. Users have a choice. If, however, you want to impose the support of other stores on Apple by the means of regulat
110.
by moralsupply 6y ago
The article states that Apple is extorting users. Is Apple forcing anybody to use their services?
111.
by moralsupply 6y ago
> time to end the Visa-MasterCard duopoly Why? Because monopolies are bad, and we don't like them, no matter if they provide value to people, if they are not built around government regulations that stop competition from happening.
112.
by moralsupply 6y ago
Money is created through 2 processes: 1. Governments operate in debt-spending mode. So governments issue bonds (glorified IOUs) to banks, which give governments money. Banks then "sell" their bonds to the FED, at which point money
113.
by moralsupply 6y ago
Where's the money for the UBI experiment coming from? There's no free lunch, folks...
114.
by moralsupply 7y ago
Why not take some of the discrete components out and introduce another cpu to handle both video and sound? it would make the design much simpler and programming easier overall. Also, why not use a more capable cpu with more embedded ram? Th
115.
by moralsupply 7y ago
It's a god system. It tries to do everything, but in the end does nothing well.
116.
by moralsupply 7y ago
Assuming that CO2 is the actual cause of global warming...
117.
by moralsupply 7y ago
Use old speakers and cellphone to generate random noise to annoy your noisy neighbors
118.
by moralsupply 7y ago
Actually there's a lot happening in finance: * Massive corporate debts * Stock markets bubble fed by QE1-QE3 and now the "no-QE" * Debt orgy circulated between pension funds, crap stocks, central banks, rating agencies, banks
119.
by moralsupply 7y ago
I'm still waiting to see the sources that show Moro interfering in the elections by suing the workers' party candidate a few weeks before the elections. A few points: 1. The judge can talk to anyone (freedom of expression here). H
120.
by moralsupply 7y ago
Please provide sources showing that Moro prosecuted Haddad a few weeks before the elections. Also, do you really believe that could have changed the outcome of the elections? It's interesting to note that Greenwald keeps playing the ke

More ›