moralestapia

3 ms·

31.
by moralestapia 17d ago
Same, 13 Mini is perfect. As soon as they release a similar form factor I'm all in.
32.
by moralestapia 17d ago
Yeah man, I wish they stopped sketching stuff over other people's walls.
33.
by moralestapia 17d ago
Wow, this is SO on point. It made me stop using Claude at all. Codex has almost surgical precision, and I like that a lot. (But nowadays I just use DeepSeek Flash. it does screw up but its cents so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯).
34.
by moralestapia 17d ago
For some definition of "struggling" that encompasses a situation where you get $3M/year for renaming CSS variables.
35.
by moralestapia 18d ago
>Can you comment on that? No answer is also an answer. He's a human, like everybody else. Mostly a bunch of hungry animals looking to put bread in our mouths. It's rarely ever something a bit more sophisticated than that.
36.
by moralestapia 18d ago
They stole it. No chance this was coincidental. The path is pretty unique and Buckmaster has a provable trail to support his story. The worse thing about this fiasco, is that we now not know if the previous breakthroughs attributed to &quot
37.
by moralestapia 19d ago
Not that anyone cares but this is as fake as it gets.
38.
by moralestapia 22d ago
>The wealthiest Europeans I know drive the cheapest vehicles. Yeah, that's a fun meme, I'm sure it still gets a lot of likes on Instagram. The data shows otherwise, however.
39.
by moralestapia 23d ago
>were there rocket trajectory calculations??? Code-wise, they're simpler than you might think, hehe.
40.
by moralestapia 23d ago
El Super Niño de las Americas!
41.
by moralestapia 27d ago
Ok, it's not called a "right", it's the fourth amendment, and federal statutes and state laws and whatnot. You got me there, pal ;) I didn't use the exact technical terms you expected, my argument is now void, nooo.
42.
by moralestapia 27d ago
Right to privacy, is this not mega-obvious?
43.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Seems the opposite of a reversal to me. Reversal would be "valued at 7B then valued at nothing", this is more like "nah, we want more" then "nah, we want more" then "yes, that's what we want :)".
44.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Wow, nice strategic move and price seems a bit low tbh. Good deal.
45.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Nice find, those are indeed pretty bad. However, if we check the market share of generative AI providers, ChatGPT+Claude+Gemini make up around 88%; while Grok is 2-4% depending on who you ask.
46.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
??? None of the major LLM chat providers (ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, and I just confirmed this) claim rights over your input. They also don't claim rights over your output, but because of how copyright law might apply, they explicitly
47.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Sorry man, that's not what this is about.
48.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Man this piece should win an Emmy or something, it's so original and well written. I also couldn't spot much AI in there. Props to the author. >rhythmically ejected spurts of bright red blood Yeah man, like in music, synesthesi
49.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Not just that but also Opus 5 is real trash. It's free for me (company pays) and I still prefer to use other models.
50.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Perhaps you didn't read the text you just copied and pasted, but here it is for you: "I have never intentionally run pixel cleaning on this monitor and I never will, I don’t care, and I would like for that overlay to go away fore
51.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
My experience as well. Opus 5 is a neverending chain of "Don't do that. Why did you do that? I've told you several times not to do that but you keep doing it." "Thinking" for more than 10 minutes for every meni
52.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
You're lying. I never do such thing. You even quoted me and it's the same text. When I edit comments I append, not overwrite content (unless its typos). I have to give you credit, this is a new fallacy I haven't encountered b
53.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
And? I don't see what point you're trying to make. Maybe I'm not smaht enough.
54.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
But you have eyes, right? And a brain, and live through your own experience and can reason about it, right? When was the last time someone undercharged you or didn't charge you at all by mistake? Is this a common occurrence? What'
55.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
I re-read that post/website several times. Can you cite the portion of it that makes it clear that reduction happened by accident?
56.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
That's a different thing. No AVO in there.
57.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Thanks for agreeing with me, GPT.
58.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Funny how it is always more charges but never less or no charges. "Random" accidents that always go against you, too biased to be random. But don't notice that too much, you might start to see patterns here and there that you
59.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Your argument is correct and I'm sure you're really smart and all that. However, Proportion of code where radians are used to represent rotation in 2D (i.e. turns): 99.9999% Proportion of code where radians are used to perform hig
60.
by moralestapia 1mo ago
It's 2026: let's etch nginx into silicon and get 10,000,000 rps at a cost of 0.1 US/day. Yes, please!

More ›