4 ms·
Ok, it's not called a "right", it's the fourth amendment, and federal statutes and state laws and whatnot. You got me there, pal ;) I didn't use the exact tech
by moralestapia 1mo ago
Ok, it's not called a "right", it's the fourth amendment, and federal statutes and state laws and whatnot.
You got me there, pal ;) I didn't use the exact technical terms you expected, my argument is now void, nooo.
I guess I should go and install one of those cameras right outside my house now.
- alex43578 1mo ago"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures" in case you forgot. I'm not saying you have to reply in a technical term - just explain how being seen and recorded driving down a public street, in a vehicle that's required to display an identifiable plate you've registered with the government, constitutes a search, seizure, or even an invasion of your privacy. Nobody's saying you have to install a camera outside your house (ignoring the dozens of cameras your neighbors have willingly installed to replace their doorbell or to deter theft/burglary). But you can't argue that the government or private businesses can't deploy cameras because you expect privacy in the middle of a road.
- awolf 1mo ago[flagged]
- filoeleven 1mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatrie_v._United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatrie_v._United_States
- alex43578 1mo ago“Individuals have reasonable expectations of privacy in their cell phone location information. The court did not hold that geofence warrants are unconstitutional”