moorhosj

39 ms·

331.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Isn't it likely that the rails were put in place as a response to people not keeping a safe distance from the edge of the cliff? I often see this assumption that regulations appear from thin air as a way to keep people down. It seems m
332.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Is sleep a banal activity?
333.
by moorhosj 8y ago
“Widely thought” based on what? This seems like the building of a straw man.
334.
by moorhosj 8y ago
This would be a great problem for Tesla to have and a signal for them to simply build more stations/partnerships. It reminds me of great the Yogi Berra quote: "Nobody goes there anymore, it's too crowded."
335.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Maybe it's as simple as wanting less development to maintain and increase the value of their currently owned property.
336.
by moorhosj 8y ago
I'll continue to assume you have no evidence as you continue to not produce any. ==Exactly so there is no need to regulate information or opinion coming out of a essentially a robot.== Two comments ago it couldn't be regulated bec
337.
by moorhosj 8y ago
==There is plenty of evidence that supports both sides of the claim.== Please share your evidence. ==The government has no reasonable reason to stop people from voicing their opinions, or expressing satire, or discussing politics on social
338.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Revenue grew from $8k to $150k in two years. You have no idea if this is a viable business, but the market seems to like it. They clearly in scaling mode: ==Peaceful Fruits is in the middle of a production expansion to 5x capacity so that w
339.
by moorhosj 8y ago
==I wouldn't assume anything there.== If you are going to dismiss it, then you should bring some evidence. Failing that, it is safe to assume that if profit-seeking corporations continue to spend billions of dollars a year for advertis
340.
by moorhosj 8y ago
==If people are so swayed with what the consume on the internet we are already doomed.== The counter to this would be: If people aren't swayed with what they consume on the internet then Facebook, Instagram, Google, Snap, Twitter, Pint
341.
by moorhosj 8y ago
In your view, are libel laws an infringement on my right to speak however I want about somebody else?
342.
by moorhosj 8y ago
I think the recent tax cut is an example of a process with a predetermined outcome where politicians were seeking political cover to make a vote the majority of Americans disagreed with. It’s certainly possible that bots on twitter, Faceboo
343.
by moorhosj 8y ago
==But I still believe that any attempts to regulate this is just political grandstanding after all it's the internet, everyone has a voice.== I'll ignore the fact that many mediums (print, radio, tv) have been regulated and ask th
344.
by moorhosj 8y ago
==Then rational investors will avoid risker share investments in new companies it will reinforce the position of incumbents who will be forced to pay out more in dividends and become bond proxies.== Investors will seek alpha wherever they c
345.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Let's ignore the fact that If people rush into these other assets like you claim, it would impact their price and return profile. The key question is which chunks of the monetary system "go away." Are those chunks a net benef
346.
by moorhosj 8y ago
==I just don't understand what they would regulate.== The first step to answering this question lies in understanding the data.
347.
by moorhosj 8y ago
==I guess your point is that the 70% white investors think as a block and can be generalized?== I’m not sure how you arrived at that assumption. The point is that this is the data (as pulled by one person), you have chosen to take the giant
348.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Nobody made an argument about class membership. I simply presented some demographic data of VC investors. Meanwhile, you completely ignore the data about investors being heavily skewed towards two specific universities. Isn’t that a past li
349.
by moorhosj 8y ago
I also brought educational background into the argument (40% from Harvard or Stanford). Why didn’t you comment on that data point and instead focus on the race data? It’s understandable that you want to focus on the diversity of outcomes, j
350.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Likely the ones doing the harassment highlighted in the survey.
351.
by moorhosj 8y ago
>It's a tricky problem to really make sense of though just because investors are so diverse. Are they? I think it could be argued that investors are one of the least diverse groups. Analysis of 1,500 investors: ==70% are white ==40%
352.
by moorhosj 8y ago
A 2 for 1, this response contains a logical fallacy and a shifting of goalposts. First, I was told all regulations are bad, this nuance is only coming up now In response to hypocrisy being pointed out. Second, which industries have historic
353.
by moorhosj 8y ago
The bill has at least 18 regulations according to this article. I’ll be waiting to hear about the 36 we are eliminating. Surely the libertarians and small-government conservatives will demand it.
354.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Not a lot of comments about the tyranny of regulations in this thread. Surprised there isn't more push-back against a law that is almost entirely regulations imposed on businesses and travelers.
355.
by moorhosj 8y ago
I will work through this. Thanks for the help!
356.
by moorhosj 8y ago
I'm trying to implement the Programmatic trellis layout, but having difficulty re-creating it because I can't see the structure of the data. I started with the "yo muze" generator and am trying to manipulate with my own
357.
by moorhosj 8y ago
This depends on what you mean by “workers getting smarter”. If it relates to a specific legal clause, you are correct that more knowledge of that clause would just lead to a new clause that benefits the corporation. If it relates to systema
358.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Email is also a tool that can be misused.
359.
by moorhosj 8y ago
Sandwich workers are hourly not salaried.
360.
by moorhosj 8y ago
By hiring a salaried worker, you are essentially locking all of their work to your company's benefit. A quality gig worker can finish an assignment at your company and go work for your biggest competitor. There is value in monopolizing

More ›