monknomo

3 ms·

1.
by monknomo 5d ago
zfs + solaris zones were amazing
2.
by monknomo 8d ago
if any android pms or execs read this comment, it should be like a slap in the face. a scathing indictment of the state of their product. just hang their heads in shame and walk into the sea
3.
by monknomo 9d ago
Probably this is after the italian word for singing
4.
by monknomo 9d ago
yes, this is a very helpful approach. I take a similar approach, partly because I find bringing up negative directions seem to bring the undesired action/direction into the agent's view and makes it more likely that they will go
5.
by monknomo 10d ago
a company is liable whether it acts via ai, an army of people, an army of dogs, or a purely mechanical machine, should it do harm. Why would an ai with a mind remove liability from the company? why would an ai without a mind remove liabilit
6.
by monknomo 22d ago
ant+ is a garmin protocol that is very common with fitness gadgets and in the bike world. It's a bit like bluetooth, but lower energy usage.
7.
by monknomo 23d ago
there were substantial crashes and booms during the gilded age as well, it wasn't uncommon to go bust and lose a house before the great depression. The panic of `73 is pretty comparable with the great depression, for example
8.
by monknomo 24d ago
wow, I hope you two have connected
9.
by monknomo 24d ago
right, this comes close to rejecting the frame, which I think you could fairly do. viewing npc as a category of person is inherently an ego driven, narcissistic way of looking at things. It is a viewpoint that lacks a theory of mind. This
10.
by monknomo 1mo ago
have you considered seeking treatment? I personally have had some spells like you are describing, and generally white knuckled through. I tried medication for the last one, and I'll be darned if it didn't work pretty well.
11.
by monknomo 1mo ago
manually scrolling before every widget loads should cause a full page refresh. zooming in should cause a full page refresh
12.
by monknomo 2mo ago
you know a pretty fair majority of men are working in white collar office work, which is directly comparable in terms of public facing and social careers? real loosely, something like 1/3, 40% are in these blue collar fields, and even
13.
by monknomo 2mo ago
It sounds like you are describing a problem with the San Francisco dating scene, which does relate to a small subset of the SWE experience, but hardly covers anything close to the totality of being an SWE.
14.
by monknomo 2mo ago
I think people, broadly, have driven life to be fairer, and that we should continue to do so
15.
by monknomo 2mo ago
Nah, I remember back then, it was definitely intended to be derogatory to the cars, to asians, and to people who like the cars.
16.
by monknomo 2mo ago
[what does the ftc say about it?]( https://www.ftc.gov/advice-guidance/competition-guidance/gui... ) Courts do not require a literal monopoly before applying rules for single firm conduct; that term is used as
17.
by monknomo 2mo ago
what you are describing sounds like an oligopoly not a monopoly. A company cannot realize monopolistic benefits without > 50% control of a market. That's not to say there aren't benefits to a large market share, but they are
18.
by monknomo 2mo ago
I think the desire for longer term planning is to smooth out the variance. Yes, frequent base touching, to ensure alignment on the broad contours is right, but I find yeeting a significant project with one day of planning has a tendency to
19.
by monknomo 2mo ago
locally correct and globally incoherent is how they seem to me. I, and a number of folks I have talked to, find some of them incomprehensible. Like each sentence makes sense, but the overall thing does not.
20.
by monknomo 2mo ago
I doubt it'd save you from purchasing a dishwasher - those things are very efficient and not very expensive. Perhaps it'd save you from loading and unloading a dishwasher
21.
by monknomo 2mo ago
What about for going out of their way to find and pay despicable people for their words?
22.
by monknomo 2mo ago
If it is true that society does not benefit from creating derived works, then why is open source so useful?
23.
by monknomo 2mo ago
the little rubber gaskets in sink drains for garbage disposals are also a cheap upgrade the brings a place up a notch
24.
by monknomo 2mo ago
So what? Why should the state grant you a monopoly at all? The reason is to encourage people to create useful writings and make useful discoveries. But we need to balance this encouragement with the benefit we get by making these writings
25.
by monknomo 2mo ago
I don't think they are very different in concept, other than one covers physical goods (and also procedures to make physical goods), and the other covers writings. The purposes of both are: "To promote the Progress of Science and
26.
by monknomo 2mo ago
the important thing is that copyright serves the public good, I do not think it currently does, at least not as well as it could
27.
by monknomo 2mo ago
reduces the ownership hunt problem, as well!
28.
by monknomo 2mo ago
20 years to make some money, and then we set the work free for the public benefit. If it's good enough for patents, I don't see why it isn't good enough for copyrights.
29.
by monknomo 2mo ago
The point is not the rounding, it is that it is not counting a total number of castles, but rather some subset of 'significant' castles
30.
by monknomo 2mo ago
balls, that's the metric line managers use to figure out who's out of whack

More ›