monkaiju

14 ms·

271.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Twixter? Xitter? Xwixter? Wtf do we call the bad blue site!?!?
272.
by monkaiju 3y ago
This looks really awful from what i can tell. I agree with the other poster that you ought to post a specific article, but the site as a whole seems pretty mask off blind techno-optimist to the point that i wonder if Thiel is funding it. I
273.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Clicked this after reading 'OpenAPI'... God im tired of the AI spam...
274.
by monkaiju 3y ago
They dont. This technology, aside from being infeasible at the level it would need to be to bring the claimed benefits, doesn't actually even have real benefits worth this dangerous development. If anything its a desperate attempt to k
275.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Hopefully eventually we fallback to the more analogue solutions that have always been better anyway. Things like actually talking with applicants, seeing things they've actually built that have existed for some amount of time, talking
276.
by monkaiju 3y ago
One down, now lets get those others off the roads too!
277.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Oh cool, looking forward to reading this!
278.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Sounds good
279.
by monkaiju 3y ago
This is extremely overblown...
280.
by monkaiju 3y ago
<Incorrect Buzzer Sound>
281.
by monkaiju 3y ago
A) yes B) its a false dichotomy to apply the standards to humans, which perceive, learn, and think, as we do to a software product
282.
by monkaiju 3y ago
If they cant interact with emergency vehicles well, which they cannot, then they shouldnt be on the road. This is only one of the growing number of obvious reasons why...
283.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Couldnt agree more, theyre better for pedestrians than any intersection.
284.
by monkaiju 3y ago
It is tho... its literally the only way humans have ever been sustainably supported
285.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Honestly given the difference in environmental impact idk why it matters. Flying is simply nit sustainable and should generally simply not be an option. Just to be clear it currently is commonly the only option, but that must change
286.
by monkaiju 3y ago
God I wish someone would start taking these satellites out...
287.
by monkaiju 3y ago
This is a rwlaly defeatist attitude thats all to common in tech circles. Somehow techies are able to both say 'technology progress is great and needs to be embraced' but when a bad tech or aspect is pointed out they switch to &#x2
288.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Theoretically sure, remotely probably, no. This is how interacting with sufficiently complex systems works, eventually you just need to accept that it cannot be fully quantified and rationalized. Also you presented it as 'we could just
289.
by monkaiju 3y ago
It really says so much that we allow these systems on our public roads.
290.
by monkaiju 3y ago
No we could not. We literally physically could not. We wouldnt be able to maintain the huge myriad of systems we do in fact need to survive while doing that. We couldnt even, without external dependencies, support humans artificially in bio
291.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Not worth the destruction of the nightsky or the waste of replacing the satellites every <5 years
292.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Expecting these companies to 'do the right thing' is very confusing to me. They've know about this for decades and not chosen to do the right thing. Dealing with fossil fuels isnt actually that hard, if our society was able t
293.
by monkaiju 3y ago
If the model was able to spit out a result for how to make nukes it means that info was in the training data, so im not rly sure how having the model return that data is different than the data just being searchable? I rly dont see this tec
294.
by monkaiju 3y ago
I've only heard that carbon sequestration is essentially a waste of time. Also thinking systemically we need to do more than address just carbon. Carbon is currently the primary focus, probably because it can be financialized, but we n
295.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Can we please not fill the air with delivery drones... Between the noise and the inevitable surveillance that'll come with them can we not just deliver via e-bike or something...
296.
by monkaiju 3y ago
It'd be much easier to stomach some level of 'necessary' cost towards ecologically re-structuring our society if people would stop pretending that that means you can simply maintain our current way of living but in a 'gr
297.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Sheriff are just unbelievably overpowered
298.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Isnt that what makes it a condo not an apartment?
299.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Couldnt agree more, well said
300.
by monkaiju 3y ago
Yes. You arent just like born into 'fulfilling' a basic human need. These services, think healthcare, food, and housing, should be public services that are guaranteed not delivered by the market. You cannot look at the market-base

More ›