monerozcash

17 ms·

271.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Do you see anyone claiming the opposite? The point is that they will not write the motto on your license plate if you object. I get that HN attracts a certain amount of pedantry, but I can't figure out what exactly you're even try
272.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
In Wooley v. Maynard SCOTUS held that NH could not require it's citizens to use a license plate displaying the state motto.
273.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
BCBS AL, AR, CA, KS, HI, LA, MA, MI, MN, NC, ND, RI, TN and VT are all not for profit, as far as I can tell. Not an exhaustive list, just asked AI and quickly checked it's output with google.
274.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Oh no, I can think very evil. I just don't see what kind of evil thinking would arrive at "Hey lets use this website to collect IP address/license plate pairs at a small scale" That just doesn't strike me as a very
275.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Oh but I have! And it is brilliant . I've got codex-cli with speech-to-text hooked up to (among other things) Home Assistant via MCP. It'll do anything. I can literally tell it to play some music from a playlist and make the ligh
276.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
The typical solutions deployed by some European bigcos are: 1) only bring burner devices 2) have your devices travel separately using some courier service Yeah, they can still request your social media profiles and whatnot. You are not part
277.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
I think this is broadly not true. Sure, the NSA can probably pull this off. Thing is, the NSA probably does not need to do this at immigration. I seriously doubt that this is a realistic problem if your threat model is anything less than &q
278.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
That's not surprising at all, but I think the people who could get caught by the justpaste.it thing are not the same people casually praising Hamas on Instagram. If you're putting terrorism related content on justpaste.it, you&#x2
279.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
If you pay a few dollars you will get access to the really fast download links.
280.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
You can just get an API which does that and skip the middle steps? Or even skip the API part and just buy that data in bulk. Or just collect it from a variety of freely leaked databases.
281.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
> Wine wrapped installers for ... which distro? I don't see why that should matter. It's games, you'd practically have to ship your own libraries anyway. >If game devs never made any linux binaries, then there won&#x2
282.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Sure, and so what? You can look up people on Accurint without license plates. Depending on what kind of account you have, you can just search by a zip code, or a state with no further identifiers. What would be the point of running a websit
283.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
For what it's worth, the somewhat hilarious reason justpaste.it is on the list is likely that it used to be a favourite of Islamic State terrorists a decade ago. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014&#x
284.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Pretty sure Kaiser Permanente is not-for-profit, many Blue Cross Blue Shield members are non-profit
285.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Samsung sells phones with their Tizen operating system. Of course you could also buy one of the purism phones, jolla is apparently planning to ship phones too. If you're willing to flash the phone, you can run postmarketos on loads of
286.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
The charitable interpretation here is that GOG should ship linux binaries, whether native or wine-wrapped installers. This would be a perfectly reasonable ask despite GOG being a webshop that only supports browsers.
287.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
I don't think you want to try that argument with immigration officials, although it might just keep your incorrect answer from being straight up fraud or willful misrepresentation. I mean, some US govt immigration forms asking for your
288.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
I think this EFF document probably provides a more comprehensive answer than what can be provided in a HN comment https://www.eff.org/files/2017/03/10/digital-privacy-border-... Peter might have good ins
289.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
"I don't use social media" is probably a good answer, it just has to be true. If they ask you "well, do you use any social media?" You'd presumably have to answer with HN, which maybe doesn't sound all tha
290.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Yeah, the idea of having a physical switch marketed as a "privacy switch" that doesn't actually physically disconnect things seems ... kind of ridiculous? Dangerous even.
291.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
>User configurable physical Privacy Switch - turn off you microphone, bluetooth, Android apps, or whatever you wish sus I don't think it is a good idea to call this a "privacy switch", obviously it works in software and ca
292.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Even if it's not sold in America, you might still be able to buy it and use it, how well that'll work depends on the spectrum compatibility of course.
293.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
> Have a look at this: https://m.slashdot.org/story/180969 Clearly there is precedent in the US and elsewhere for prosecution based on accessing URLs "prosecution based on accessing URLs" is a dishonest wa
294.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
It's possible to produce a technical solution to this using tools like SGX.
295.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
> Yes but National Security Letters make that pointless It seems ridiculous to use the term "national security letter" as opposed to "subpoena" in this context, there is no relevant distinction between the two when it
296.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
You don't even need a photo ID to open a bank account in the UK
297.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
> I seem to remember people getting burned for publicly disclosing security vulnerabilities after stubborn agencies refused to fix them for years. Stuff like, exposing thousands of SSNs through a public gateway.. This has never happened
298.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
This still doesn't make any sense. Let’s say you have a hypothetical 25 nanograms of radioactive particulates in your body. Now we add 0.1%, and you have 25.025 nanograms of radioactive particulates in your body. This is not a meaningf
299.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
Pretty much all passports in the world have been digital for years, and it seems ... fine? There's a signed blob on the RFID chip in your passport that could be easily copied to any phone, hardly any on-device implementation work to be
300.
by monerozcash 11mo ago
>I had assumed you were coming from a similar position, and your argument was more of a reductio-ad-absurdum. >But if you're not - the fact it's putting a chilling effect on this activity right here is a problem. I've p

More ›